Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Bernie who? Why Tomic’s time is over

Written By Unknown on Senin, 30 Juni 2014 | 23.18

Youngster Nick Kyrgios says he has 'nothing to lose' when he takes on tennis heavy weight Rafael Nadal in the fourth round of Wimbledon tonight.

He had nine lives but don't call him a cat. Australia's Nick Kyrgios celebrates beating France's Richard Gasquet after saving nine match points at the 2014 Wimbledon Championships. AFP PHOTO / ANDREW COWIE Source: AFP

THERE'S a great story from a couple of years back about 19-year-old Australian tennis prodigy Nick Kyrgios, who tomorrow faces Rafael Nadal in the fourth round at Wimbledon.

Kyrgios was practising with Lleyton Hewitt at the Australian Open on a typically dry, scorching Melbourne summer day. He was desperate for a drink but Lleyton wouldn't "let" him have one.

It's not that Hewitt expressly forbade Kyrgios to go for his drink bottle. It's that Hewitt wasn't stopping for a drink and Kyrgios didn't want to seem presumptuous, arrogant or weak by comparison.

"It was a nightmare, I wanted a drink for 45 minutes but I was scared to initiate it," he recalled this week.

The moral of the story is simple: can you imagine Bernard Tomic ever behaving that way? Forget lapping a few drops of water, Tomic probably would have stopped for a lapdance halfway through the practice session.

Unlike Tomic, Nick Kyrgios is genuinely hungry for success. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant) Source: NewsComAu

The arrival this week of Nick Kyrgios as a genuine tennis sensation is an event most tennis fans have long been waiting for. At last, we no longer have to pretend we like Bernard Tomic.

Kyrgios, if you missed it, saved a record-equalling nine match points in his epic five-set upset of French star Richard Gasquet. In the final game, Kyrgios blew Gasquet away. Tomic would have just blown a gasket.

To date, Kyrgios has boomed more aces (76) than anyone else at this year's Wimbledon. But he has shown a promising array of strokes to back up his power, showing frequent deft touches. The guy's got a subtle sense of humour too.

Fourteen plus zero equals 14. Nice maths, Nick!

The last couple of years have been tough for Aussie tennis fans as we've watched Bernard Tomic occasionally show his talent, but mostly abuse it, mock it, waste it. The day he lost the quickest ever ATP game in about the time it takes to boil rice was just one of many low points.

Yet still we've cheered for him, hoping against hope that it's surely just a matter of time until his infantile mind catches up with his oversized body.

Hasn't happened yet and maybe it never will. Either way, it now scarcely matters because Nick Kyrgios is number one in our hearts. This likeable young Canberran has a lovely vibe about him. He's aggressive but controlled, a killer on the court and a puppy dog off it.

The last time Tomic cried like this was when he had to sell his orange sports car. AFP PHOTO / ANDREW COWIE Source: AFP

You've got to be half a bastard to win tennis matches, but only half. It also helps if you're a decent, well-rounded human being. Just ask Andre Agassi and Roger Federer and our own Pat Rafter, who all started their careers as angry young men, then started winning major trophies when they got their heads together.

Tomic may do likewise. There's still time for him. But that's for him to worry about now, not us, because the hopes of most Australians are now officially pinned on the shoulders of Nick Kyrgios.

"I'm just excited to be out there and have a chance to excite the crowd again," Kyrgios said after beating Gasquet.

Hear that? It's about us, not him, about what we feel not what he feels.

"Australia's history of tennis goes a long way back, but Pat Cash mentoring you and and Lleyton giving advice, it's always good having those tennis legends helping you," Kyrgios said in the same interview

Get that, Bernie? The kid takes advice.

Compare those quotes to an infamous interview Tomic did way back in 2007, aged just 14 when he said he wanted to have "the mind of Pete Sampras, the groundstrokes of Roger Federer and the heart of Lleyton Hewitt".

There seems to be a word missing before the word "head" on those bags. AFP PHOTO / GLYN KIRK Source: AFP

Bernard Tomic has always had big dreams and an even bigger ego. Now he's got the big ranking to go with it. He'll be somewhere above 100 after Wimbledon.

As for Kyrgios, he'll be double digits. And number one with a bullet in the hearts of Aussie tennis fans regardless of how he does against Nadal. One thing we can bank on: this match won't be over by the first commercial break.

Originally published as Bernie who? Why Tomic's time is over
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Gore to Abbott: Get out of the way

Former US Vice President Al Gore joined MP Clive Palmer to announce the Palmer United Party will vote to abolish the carbon tax in the Senate, and move for an Emissions Trading Scheme.

AL GORE has warned Tony Abbott to "change or get out of the way" of sensible environmental policy, labelling the Prime Minister a "straight-out climate denier".

Speaking to Vice after forging an unlikely alliance with Clive Palmer, the former US vice-president said "silly" initiatives like the government's direct action plan had "never worked anywhere."

Mr Gore also praised the Palmer United Party leader, who has backed a carbon emissions trading scheme with a starting price of zero dollars, but only if Australia's main trading partners adopt a similar mechanism, for putting forward a plan that was "so much better than would have been the case".

"He does have an unusual style," Mr Gore said of the Australian mining magnate. "But I think that whatever unusual features to his style there may be, deep down there's absolutely no question in my mind that he has a sense of social justice, he has a keen sense of right and wrong. ... He wants to make the world a better place."

Strange bedfellows ... Clive Palmer and former United States vice-president Al Gore at their press conference at Parliament House in Canberra. Source: News Corp Australia

Mr Gore also said Mr Abbott — a "straight-out climate denier" — would soon find himself on the wrong side of history.

"I think we're not far from a point where people will look back on climate denialists as extremely odd, self destructive," he said.

Mr Gore's message to the PM: "Please, either change or get out of the way. Because Australia wants to have the kind of sensible policies that the rest of the world is moving toward.

"It's coming. We've won this. The only question is how much time it's going to take and how much damage is going to be programmed into the climate system in the meantime."

Originally published as Gore to Abbott: Get out of the way

23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Rolf Harris found guilty

Under scrutiny ... Rolf Harris with his daughter Bindi after attending Southwark Crown Court in central London. Picture: Niklas Halle'n Source: AFP

ROLF Harris has been found guilty of sexually assaulting four teenage school girls over an almost 20-year period with a jury unanimously declaring him guilty on all charges in a sensational conclusion to his long running trial.

After eight days of deliberations as the trial entered its eighth week, the six man and six woman jury returned to court 2 of Southwark Crown Court in central London shortly after lunch (local time) to unanimously declare his guilt.

Verdict decided ... Rolf Harris arrives at Southwark Crown Court today in London, England. Picture: Danny E. Martindale Source: Getty Images

The 84-year-old Harris — a household name with more than 50 years in the music, art and TV entertainment industries — was expressionless as Judge Nigel Sweeney asked the jury forewoman for their verdict.

The legendary Australian entertainer showed no emotion as the jury forewoman said "guilty" on each count.

As he left the defendant's dock, Harris managed a reassuring nod and grimace for his family who held hands and comforted each other.

For seven weeks they had heard claims by the prosecution their loved one was a sinister pervert who groomed girls for abuse, and despite making audible remarks and head shakes while victims testified, yesterday they said nothing in the face of the verdict.

Guilty ... Harris arrives with his wife Alwen Hughes (2nd R) and daughter Bindi (L) at Southwark Crown Court in London before hearing the verdict. Picture: AFP Source: AFP

The family's spokesman Abel Hadden asked they be respected and not asked for comment.

"Following today's verdicts, we have been asked to make it clear that neither the Harris family, their lawyers, agents or friends will be making any public comments or being available for interview either here or in Australia," he said.

Harris barrister Sonia Woodley said she would today prepare a report on his medical condition, as she plans to ask for a significant jail sentence reduction on Friday on the grounds of his age and general poor health.

Harris had a mini-stroke some years ago and surgery to put in two stents for artery blockages.

Harris has been granted bail and will be sentenced on Friday.

His family also showed no reaction as the verdict was announced although all sat with heads bowed and held hands.

Harris left the court about an hour and a half after the verdicts, clutching his wife Alwen's hand and that of daughter Bindi as they walked slowly to a waiting car, much in the same way they have done every day during the past eight weeks of his trial.

When asked by News Corp Australia whether he had anything to say, Harris made no comment.

Outside court, emotional jury members hugged each other. Eight weeks ago they were strangers but today they share a bond. Such was the weight of the burden placed upon them to convict the star that the judge said they could be exempt from jury duty, if they chose, for the next 10 years.

Harris' friends and manager Jan Kennedy was also emotional as she hugged supporters outside court.

Harris, charged last year with 12 counts of indecently assaulting four girls from 1968 to 1986, was arrested in 2012 after woman in Australia, England and New Zealand began coming forward with claims in the wake of the high-profile child sex revelations surrounding British entertainer Jimmy Savile and other celebrities in the UK in the 1960s, '70s and '80s.

Jenny Hopkins, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for the CPS in London, said prosecution in such historical cases was always difficult, but she hoped the Harris verdicts would act as a warning to others and provide victims with the courage to come forward no matter when the abuse occurred.

"Rolf Harris used his status and position as a world famous children's entertainer to sexually assault young girls over a period spanning 18 years," Ms Hopkins said.

"The victims in this case have suffered in silence for many years and have only recently found the courage to come forward. I would like to pay tribute to the bravery they displayed in coming to court and giving evidence. That bravery and determination has seen Rolf Harris brought to justice and held to account.

"Each victim, unknown to the others, described a similar pattern of behaviour; that of a man acting without fear of the consequences."

Supported by family ... Rolf Harris, and his daughter Bindi Harris at Southwark Crown Court. Picture: Danny E. Martindale Source: Getty Images

The six male and six female jurors had apparently been struggling with a verdict, judging by the eight questions they put to Judge Sweeney.

On the second day of deliberations, the jury asked what steps needed to be taken toward a majority rule verdict over Judge Sweeney's demand for a unanimous verdict.

He even had to remind them to use their common sense in their approach as they appeared confused with balancing their opinion with the evidence.

The judge suggested they show "courage" in their judgments regardless of the consequences and even felt obliged to remind them that good character of the celebrity was not a defence.

Harris had displayed an almost arrogant jocular approach to proceedings with his singing of Jake the Peg and description of his inventing the wobble board and lengthy regaling in his successes over 50 years of entertainment.

He even laughed at one stage, and had to be reminded it was no laughing matter, when it was put to him he had had oral sex with one victim just metres away from his then teenage sleeping daughter Bindi.

All the women were lying, he said, as he dismissed their evidence as misconstrued his "touchy freely" friendly way.

His mood did change, however, as the trial went on, as did that of his family and supporters who audibly tut-tutted at evidence and even scoffed and murmured "get off" when at least one woman began crying as she recalled her trauma following her alleged indecent assault at the hands of Harris.

There were 38 prosecution witnesses and 15 for the defence. But there were to have been many more for both sides.

During the trial the court heard one victim was 13-years-old when she went on holidays with Harris, his wife Alwen and their daughter and best friend Bindi.

She claimed she was first abused when she stepped out of a shower wearing a towel when in a hotel in Hawaii.

She was shocked to see Harris standing in her room, and he gave her a hug before spitting on his fingers then slipping his hand into her towel and assaulting her.

She had had sex education but could not understand what had happened.

Days later she was on the beach and had walked out of the sea when Harris greeted her with a towel and again hugging her in the towel, slipped his hand into her bikini bottoms.

She was to be assaulted twice more on that trip to Hawaii and Australia.

Harris had complemented her on how she looked lovely in her bikini, an act which Harris himself admitted in his trial was a reference to her body and how he had been sexually attracted to her.

It was a damning admission that the jury was reminded about by Judge Nigel Sweeney in his summing up before they retired to consider their verdict.

None of those assaults, however, formed the basis of the indictments since they happened outside the jurisdiction, but the prosecution maintained they supported the build-up to the at least seven instances of abuse, including some involving the spitting on fingers, that the jury accepted happened in England when the girl was still under 16.

Most of those occurred in Harris' home in Bray west of London as the girl visited his daughter Bindi.

And even after she was over the legal age of consent, there were still more tawdry stories from the same victim that the prosecution said went to the heart of the Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde "dark side" character of Harris, including forcing her to give him oral sex when he pulled over in a breakdown lane on a freeway and on a footpath in the country, an indecent assault in front of a seven year old friend and a masturbating fondle while they sat on the couch with an unknowing Bindi watching television.

Then there was a letter Harris wrote to the victim's father, in which he sought forgiveness; he said it was for having had a relationship with the much younger woman, 35 years his junior, while the prosecution successfully argued it was a confessional letter after grooming the woman for sex since she was 13 years old.

Another victim was eight years old in 1969 when she was allegedly assaulted in a community hall where Harris had been performing Two Little Boys.

She asked for his autograph and when he drew her close he allegedly put his hand around over bottom and forcibly between her legs. He made that motion twice.

A third victim also had her bottom grabbed in the mid-to-late 1970s, when she was about 14 years old and working as a waitress at a TV celebrity sports contest day.

She alleged Harris rubbed her back before squeezing her bottom.

There were six other alleged indecent assaults by Harris including on two Australian make-up artists, a 16-year-old fan and her mother from Newcastle, an 18-year-old traveller in Malta who feared she was about to be raped and a 12-year-old girl from Darwin.

These all occurred outside the jurisdiction of the court but were used by the prosecution to show a "pattern" by the defendant.

Originally published as Rolf Harris found guilty
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Look, mum, no hands: pants man

It's The Final Countdown to getting dressed in trackie-dacks. Source: YouTube

I WATCH a lot of television. And I understand a lot of reality stars are only in it for their 15 minutes of fame. But what do most of them offer us by way of practical tips?

My guess is: not much.

So I was pleasantly surprised when I stumbled upon this video which combines the dynamicism of a Bruce Lee film, the score of a federal election and the kind of demure abashment sadly lacking in today's fashion industry.

Not only does this bloke get his pants on without touching them with his hands, but he does it in well under a minute. It takes me longer than that if I use my hands. And at least one or two attempts as I often end up careening across the room into furniture. He even puts them on the right way round.

This is perhaps the most informative and mesmerising clip you'll see today.

Mysophobia (or verminophobia - the pathological fear of contamination and germs) sufferers rejoice! Watch and learn, folks. Watch and learn.

Originally published as Look, mum, no hands: pants man

23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Can we still be friends with Facebook?

Social network Facebook is under fire after its covert 'emotional contagion' study left some users outraged.

Facebook has come under fire for allowing a social "emotional contagion" study. Source: AFP

THERE'S a sign up behind the counter in a cafe in Adelaide that chirpily suggests "If you see someone without a smile, give them one of yours".

The point of the old adage is that moods can be contagious, and we all have the power to spread a bit of cheer. Or gloom. But no-one likes a party pooper.

Our power to manipulate moods in real life — ours and other people's — is something we've always understood innately.

But now, scientists commissioned by social media behemoth Facebook, in the US, have revealed research they say proves our emotions can be toyed with in the virtual world, on social media, where so many of us spend so much of our time.

And their experiment has caused a hellbroth of trouble.

Over a random week in 2012, without telling them, researchers from Facebook, the University of California, University of San Francisco and Cornell University, manipulated the news feeds of 689,000 users, filtering content to tone down updates containing words considered to be "negative" for some people and words considered "positive" for other users.
The point of the study? To see if the emotions people were exposed to would have an influence over the mood of their own subsequent status updates.

They found that they did. They had proved the possibility of "emotional contagion".

"..for people who had positive content reduced in their News Feed, a larger percentage of words in people's status updates were negative and a smaller percentage were positive. When negativity

was reduced, the opposite pattern occurred," the study's authors wrote.

The findings of the study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences earlier this month, have sent shockwaves around the world — and not just because of the findings of the experiment itself, but because the guinea pigs, real people like you, had no idea they were taking part.

The researchers maintain the experiment was legal, because users must agree to Facebook's Data Use policy, when they sign up for an account.

But legal experts, academics and politicians around the world say that while the study may have been legal, it was unethical, too, because users were not able to give "informed consent".

Internet expert Clay Johnson, who co-founded the firm which managed Barack Obama's online campaign for the 2008 Presidential election called the study "terrifying" and called for someone to launch a class action against Facebook.

"In the wake of both the Snowden stuff and the Cuba Twitter stuff, the Facebook 'transmission of anger' experiment is terrifying", Mr Johnson said in a series of tweets.

"Could the CIA incite revolution in Sudan by pressuring Facebook to promote discontent? Should that be legal?"

Rachel Spencer, from the School of Law at the University of South Australia, said putting the legality of the study aside, the research appeared not to have followed the basic standards for ethical research by a university.

"Normally, when you conduct research into human subjects, you have to get permission from the Ethics Committee of a university and I would be very surprised if an Ethics Committee would approve of such a methodology," Ms Spencer said.

She said forcing people to feel happier or sadder, or withholding potentially important personal information because it was negative, such as the death of a friend or loved one, clearly could have a range of serious and worrying consequences.

"Finding out that you had been manipulated like that could also cause adverse consequences too — people with mental health issues or a fragile state of mind, for whatever reason, could be quite severely affected," she said.

"Just the thought of a company monitoring what I'm being told is a little bit creepy."

Terry O'Gorman, president of the Australian Councils for Civil Liberties agreed, saying Facebook's argument that the study was above board was "legalistic".

"Do you know anyone who's read 2000 words of Facebook's privacy policy?" Mr O'Gorman said.

"People genuinely feel they've been used by Facebook.

"If you're one of the users, and you find that your Facebook usage has been subject to some kind of emotional analysis, I think you're entitled to say that's a breach of privacy."

He said the fact tens of thousands of people still might not be aware their News Feed had been manipulated was irrelevant.

"Because people do not realise that in using Facebook, they're handing over data to be analysed by anonymous people who will never tell you what they're using it for and you'll never know the end result."

But if the whole thing feels creepy and Orwellian, what's in it for Facebook? Merely to add to the canon of psychology research?
Hardly, says Dr Karen Nelson-Field, Senior Research in the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute at UniSA.

It's all about marketing, she says, adding that she personally thinks the study adds to our understanding of the kinds of stimuli people respond to emotionally and that they share socially.

"What they've done is amazing, because it adds to the psychology literature on such a large scale," Dr Nelson-Field said.

"It would have been largely to see what content gets talked about, it would have been related around emotions.

"They've done it to understand a benchmark reaction (from users) to brands and reaction to sentiment to work out, in the future, where advertisers are best placed in terms of sending out positive and negative messages.

"It's not rocket science. If you watch a scary movie, you feel scared."

Dr Nelson-Field said people who argued the study was deceptive and unethical were "overreacting".

"If you sign up for a platform, you sign up to their privacy statements.
"You're exposing yourself to third party (agreements) constantly, so unless you turn your cookies off, you give Facebook 100 per cent rights to serve everything you do — when I say serve, I mean they can on-sell their data to a third party of their can use it themselves."

She said she accepted there may be more ethical ways to conduct the same kinds of research, particularly to filter out people who identified as having mental health issues or who were on medication for a mental illness.
But ultimately, people should know what they're getting into from the outset.

"Take some responsibility," she said.

"Sure, there's always going to be those that are less tech-savvy than others, but at the end of the day, what do you expect? And it hasn't done any harm."

Originally published as Can we still be friends with Facebook?
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Art, or pathetic grab for publicity?

Artwork depicting Charles Saatchi throttling his ex-wife Nigella Lawson being offered for sale on his website. Artist is D Udaiyan. Source: Supplied

LONG after the one — time ad man, renowned art collector and confirmed throttler Charles Saatchi gave his then-wife Nigella Lawson one his most memorable public performances, the simply horrendous incident is still making news.

'Artworks' — and that word is even demeaned in this context — have made their way onto, surprise, surprise, the Saatchi Art website — an American website with ties to the London gallery — 12 months after the London restaurant incident where Saatchi was photographed 'throttling' his globally renowned wife.

Of course, I'd personally love an arty piece of domestic violence/physical abuse/wedded bullying — priced from AU$266 to AU$32,000 — hanging in my little inner-city dwelling.

What a talking point! Just imagine the hours of viewing pleasure.

What a complete toss the whole notion is.

Art, or just poor taste? Source: Supplied

Saatchi was cautioned for assault last June after the appalling restaurant display. The pair went on to divorce seven weeks later.

Later that year, of course, the once-wedded pair were back in the news over a fraud case 'starring' former personal assistants. That time around, there were allegations of Lawson's drug use and Saatchi's controlling behaviour.

But back to these heartfelt and simply sensational artworks.

Wouldn't you want them to remember the good times? The great times? The very happy times of a marriage that came to an end when pictures of the couple were printed came to light after a mega physical dispute in the smart and celebrity-frequented London restaurant, Scotts?

Sure, sure, some members of the art-eratti will be claiming that pulling them down would be censorship.

They'll say that they are an exquisite symbol of free artistic speech; of 'real' life; that they are not inciting hatred but are representing love having gone seriously wrong. But to me, they are none of the above. These are two people who are still alive and both are being represented in a revolting light. Again.

Nigella Lawson's domestic goddess image has had to weather a lot of controversy. Picture: Justin Lloyd Source: Supplied

To actually see these drawings and paintings re-enacting the Saatchi-Lawson restaurant calamity is pure tastelessness.

Would anyone — including the subjects involved — really shell out $10000 for a work of a smug-looking Saatchi with a blatantly frightened Nigella, set against a jaunty, multi-hued, van Gogh-inspired background?

The photographs in the London restaurant were obviously the straw that broke the camel's back _ and the pair's marriage. And these artworks, which were painted and drawn not long after the event, shouldn't be glorified. They should be garbaged.

A report in the UK's Independent singles out certain pieces — 'Art Collector Throttling Cook' and 'Last Course', and one of the artists, Darren Udaiyan (who concocted the van Gogh inspired piece) draws an analogy that Saatchi 'throttling his wife' is akin to him 'squeezing the art market'.

Good grief. The whole thing is just tasteless.

Originally published as Art, or pathetic grab for publicity?
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Rolf Harris found guilty

Under scrutiny ... Rolf Harris with his daughter Bindi after attending Southwark Crown Court in central London. Picture: Niklas Halle'n Source: AFP

ROLF Harris has been found guilty of sexually assaulting four teenage school girls over an almost 20-year period with a jury unanimously declaring him guilty on all charges in a sensational conclusion to his long running trial.

After eight days of deliberations as the trial entered its eighth week, the six man and six woman jury returned to court 2 of Southwark Crown Court in central London shortly after lunch (local time) to unanimously declare his guilt.

Verdict decided ... Rolf Harris arrives at Southwark Crown Court today in London, England. Picture: Danny E. Martindale Source: Getty Images

The 84-year-old Harris — a household name with more than 50 years in the music, art and TV entertainment industries — was expressionless as Judge Nigel Sweeney asked the jury forewoman for their verdict.

The legendary Australian entertainer showed no emotion as the jury forewoman said "guilty" on each count.

As he left the defendant's dock, Harris managed a reassuring nod and grimace for his family who held hands and comforted each other.

For seven weeks they had heard claims by the prosecution their loved one was a sinister pervert who groomed girls for abuse, and despite making audible remarks and head shakes while victims testified, yesterday they said nothing in the face of the verdict.

Guilty ... Harris arrives with his wife Alwen Hughes (2nd R) and daughter Bindi (L) at Southwark Crown Court in London before hearing the verdict. Picture: AFP Source: AFP

The family's spokesman Abel Hadden asked they be respected and not asked for comment.

"Following today's verdicts, we have been asked to make it clear that neither the Harris family, their lawyers, agents or friends will be making any public comments or being available for interview either here or in Australia," he said.

Harris barrister Sonia Woodley said she would today prepare a report on his medical condition, as she plans to ask for a significant jail sentence reduction on Friday on the grounds of his age and general poor health.

Harris had a mini-stroke some years ago and surgery to put in two stents for artery blockages.

Harris has been granted bail and will be sentenced on Friday.

His family also showed no reaction as the verdict was announced although all sat with heads bowed and held hands.

Harris left the court about an hour and a half after the verdicts, clutching his wife Alwen's hand and that of daughter Bindi as they walked slowly to a waiting car, much in the same way they have done every day during the past eight weeks of his trial.

When asked by News Corp Australia whether he had anything to say, Harris made no comment.

Outside court, emotional jury members hugged each other. Eight weeks ago they were strangers but today they share a bond. Such was the weight of the burden placed upon them to convict the star that the judge said they could be exempt from jury duty, if they chose, for the next 10 years.

Harris' friends and manager Jan Kennedy was also emotional as she hugged supporters outside court.

Harris, charged last year with 12 counts of indecently assaulting four girls from 1968 to 1986, was arrested in 2012 after woman in Australia, England and New Zealand began coming forward with claims in the wake of the high-profile child sex revelations surrounding British entertainer Jimmy Savile and other celebrities in the UK in the 1960s, '70s and '80s.

Jenny Hopkins, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for the CPS in London, said prosecution in such historical cases was always difficult, but she hoped the Harris verdicts would act as a warning to others and provide victims with the courage to come forward no matter when the abuse occurred.

"Rolf Harris used his status and position as a world famous children's entertainer to sexually assault young girls over a period spanning 18 years," Ms Hopkins said.

"The victims in this case have suffered in silence for many years and have only recently found the courage to come forward. I would like to pay tribute to the bravery they displayed in coming to court and giving evidence. That bravery and determination has seen Rolf Harris brought to justice and held to account.

"Each victim, unknown to the others, described a similar pattern of behaviour; that of a man acting without fear of the consequences."

Supported by family ... Rolf Harris, and his daughter Bindi Harris at Southwark Crown Court. Picture: Danny E. Martindale Source: Getty Images

The six male and six female jurors had apparently been struggling with a verdict, judging by the eight questions they put to Judge Sweeney.

On the second day of deliberations, the jury asked what steps needed to be taken toward a majority rule verdict over Judge Sweeney's demand for a unanimous verdict.

He even had to remind them to use their common sense in their approach as they appeared confused with balancing their opinion with the evidence.

The judge suggested they show "courage" in their judgments regardless of the consequences and even felt obliged to remind them that good character of the celebrity was not a defence.

Harris had displayed an almost arrogant jocular approach to proceedings with his singing of Jake the Peg and description of his inventing the wobble board and lengthy regaling in his successes over 50 years of entertainment.

He even laughed at one stage, and had to be reminded it was no laughing matter, when it was put to him he had had oral sex with one victim just metres away from his then teenage sleeping daughter Bindi.

All the women were lying, he said, as he dismissed their evidence as misconstrued his "touchy freely" friendly way.

His mood did change, however, as the trial went on, as did that of his family and supporters who audibly tut-tutted at evidence and even scoffed and murmured "get off" when at least one woman began crying as she recalled her trauma following her alleged indecent assault at the hands of Harris.

There were 38 prosecution witnesses and 15 for the defence. But there were to have been many more for both sides.

During the trial the court heard one victim was 13-years-old when she went on holidays with Harris, his wife Alwen and their daughter and best friend Bindi.

She claimed she was first abused when she stepped out of a shower wearing a towel when in a hotel in Hawaii.

She was shocked to see Harris standing in her room, and he gave her a hug before spitting on his fingers then slipping his hand into her towel and assaulting her.

She had had sex education but could not understand what had happened.

Days later she was on the beach and had walked out of the sea when Harris greeted her with a towel and again hugging her in the towel, slipped his hand into her bikini bottoms.

She was to be assaulted twice more on that trip to Hawaii and Australia.

Harris had complemented her on how she looked lovely in her bikini, an act which Harris himself admitted in his trial was a reference to her body and how he had been sexually attracted to her.

It was a damning admission that the jury was reminded about by Judge Nigel Sweeney in his summing up before they retired to consider their verdict.

None of those assaults, however, formed the basis of the indictments since they happened outside the jurisdiction, but the prosecution maintained they supported the build-up to the at least seven instances of abuse, including some involving the spitting on fingers, that the jury accepted happened in England when the girl was still under 16.

Most of those occurred in Harris' home in Bray west of London as the girl visited his daughter Bindi.

And even after she was over the legal age of consent, there were still more tawdry stories from the same victim that the prosecution said went to the heart of the Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde "dark side" character of Harris, including forcing her to give him oral sex when he pulled over in a breakdown lane on a freeway and on a footpath in the country, an indecent assault in front of a seven year old friend and a masturbating fondle while they sat on the couch with an unknowing Bindi watching television.

Then there was a letter Harris wrote to the victim's father, in which he sought forgiveness; he said it was for having had a relationship with the much younger woman, 35 years his junior, while the prosecution successfully argued it was a confessional letter after grooming the woman for sex since she was 13 years old.

Another victim was eight years old in 1969 when she was allegedly assaulted in a community hall where Harris had been performing Two Little Boys.

She asked for his autograph and when he drew her close he allegedly put his hand around over bottom and forcibly between her legs. He made that motion twice.

A third victim also had her bottom grabbed in the mid-to-late 1970s, when she was about 14 years old and working as a waitress at a TV celebrity sports contest day.

She alleged Harris rubbed her back before squeezing her bottom.

There were six other alleged indecent assaults by Harris including on two Australian make-up artists, a 16-year-old fan and her mother from Newcastle, an 18-year-old traveller in Malta who feared she was about to be raped and a 12-year-old girl from Darwin.

These all occurred outside the jurisdiction of the court but were used by the prosecution to show a "pattern" by the defendant.

Originally published as Rolf Harris found guilty
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Ricky’s ‘killer sauce’ turns up heat

Written By Unknown on Senin, 23 Juni 2014 | 23.18

Singing 'This is what it feels like', Victoria's Jackson Thomas powers through his performance. Courtesy: The Voice

TEAM Ricky stormed into favouritism in the first of The Voice's live finals, with his "killer sauce" singers turning up the heat on the competition.

In the surprise package of the evening, Jackson Thomas won his coach Ricky Martin's fast pass to the next round — saved from the public vote, which opened for the first time this season.

Thomas turned summer's pop rock anthem This Is What It Feels Like into an achingly emotional ballad which tamed rival coach on The Voice Kylie Minogue and wowed Joel Madden and will.i.am.

JOEL MADDEN: Opens up on life and 'that joint'

VOICE KIDS: Plea to internet trolls

Rocking out ... Jackson Thomas on The Voice with Team Ricky. Source: Channel 9

The quiet achiever overcame the power and passion of C Major, Sabrina Batshon and Elly Oh who all delivered stand-out performances in a somewhat patchy episode.

Coldplay, especially the smiling dial of front man Chris Martin, set an electric tone opening the show.

It's clear the contestants were also star struck when they met him backstage.

Musical genius ... Chris Martin on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

A real show ... Chris Martin and the band Coldplay on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

Martin's opening was followed by performances from Team Will's Anja Nissen, Mat Verevis, ZK and Gabriel and Cecelia.

Their Black Eyed Peas coach responded with mixed feelings, praising their collective efforts but admitting they were "rocky" and "tense" in parts.

Singing 'Walking on a Dream', duo Gabriel and Cecilia get fast tracked into the next round of The Voice. Courtesy: The Voice

His decision to save sibling duo Gabriel and Cecelia divided social media, but won support from Madden and Minogue.

Getting another chance ... Gabriel and Cecelia saved on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

The pop princess, who hosted her team over dinner at Mr Chow's, her favourite restaurant in London, also drew solid performances from her foursome: with charismatic drummer Johnny Rollins rewarded with her save.

Performing to the beat of his drum ... Johnny Rollins on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

Singing 'Happy', Victorian Johnny Rollins goes from back of the band to front man with ease. Courtesy: The Voice

Others watching the show also backed Rollins and his talent.

Team Joel's resident rocker Frank Lakoudis was back at his ball-tearing best, raising the roof with the Kiss classic, I Was Made For Lovin' You and winning his way to the next live final.

Singing the Kiss classic, 'I was made for lovin' you', Frank Lakoudis sings loud and proud. Courtesy: The Voice

On fire ... Frank Lakoudis dons a cape on stage for The Voice. Source: Channel 9

Captivating ... Frank performs on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

There was also a lot of love in the Twittersphere for Lakoudis, but some questioned his choice to wear a cape as part of his wardrobe choice.

Amping up the vamp action, a black lace and thigh-high boot-wearing Holly Tapp showed little of the hippie cowgirl who charmed in the blind auditions, singing Bang Bang.

Hippie cowgirl ... singer Holly Tapp on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

Isaac McGovern and Taila Gouge both showed more of their potential, with 17-year-old Gouge fierce and feminine with her take on Pink's Who Knew.

Giving his best shot ... Isaac McGovern sang Best Day Of My Life. Source: Channel 9

Hoping for a place ... Taila Gouge performed Pink's song Who Knew. Source: Channel 9

At the marathon episode's end, iTunes voting showed who the viewer favourites are, with Team Will's ZK leading the early chart race (climbing to no. 38); followed by Team Kylie's Kat Jade (no. 44); and Robbie Balmer (no. 48).

A new look ... for Kat Jade on The Voice. Source: Channel 9


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

How to turn your cooking fails into works of art

The Struggle Plate is an online safe haven for average cooks. Source: Instagram

IT'S the ultimate 21st century dilemma: you cook a meal, it tastes delicious, but it looks bloody awful.

There's no way you can post a photo of your creation on Instagram. Everyone on the #foodporn hashtag would make a mockery of you.

Enter The Struggle Plate — an awesome Instagram account and online safe haven for average cooks everywhere.

Users submit photos of their gross-looking meals using the #struggleplate hashtag and the worst offenders are posted on the Instagram account. Its mantra? "Bad food + confidence = the struggle plate".

Here's how Urban Dictionary defines this hilarious food trend:

"A dish of food that either looks like nasty, unappetising slop or is simply ugly in presentation, even if it might actually taste good," it reads.

"Term even applies to when one posts a picture that exposes his or her lack of culinary savvy.

"Person who prepared said food is usually quite delusional, really believing they just threw down like a gourmet chef."

Here are some shining examples of the ultimate #struggleplate. A warning: These might gross you out.

Do you have a Struggle Plate photo you'd like to share? Tag news.com.au on Twitter or Instagram using the hashtag #struggleplate.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Live: Socceroos v Spain

LIVE coverage of the FIFA World Cup 2014 in Brazil. Every day we follow the Socceroos on their World Cup journey. Plus all the highlights from Brazil, the latest breaking World Cup news, the best goals, the results and the real stories behind the scenes of the World Cup.

IT'S the last hurrah for Ange Postecoglou and the Socceroos as they take on deposed world champion Spain in both sides' final appearance at the 2014 World Cup.

Follow the blow-by-blow coverage below.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

The My Family sticker angst

The My Family car stickers have made their way overseas. Source: News Limited

OPINION: IF YOU want your dinner party to run smoothly, never question someone's politics, religion or attitudes to sex, the theory goes. But here's a friendly warning: there is one other question it's best to leave alone.

"How do you feel about those My Family stickers, an Australian invention I just read are selling massively in the US?"

You may think barbecue dad, shopping mum and sporty kids plus stick pets, have been around long enough for us to get over all the My Family rage. But don't be fooled; unless you have your stab vest on, don't ask your friends this if you want to remain friends.

After seeing an article titled, Stick family feud: Trivial but powerful, what those cartoon family decals, and the backlash against them, says about us, in a Canadian online news magazine, I asked the crew on my Facebook page The Perch for their thoughts — and the sparks still flew.

My family stickers seen on a Landcruiser. Source: News Limited

"I hate them, but I saw one last week with a big dinosaur saying, 'Your stick family was delicious'. THAT was funny,'' wrote one.

Another said: "I can't stand them, my hubby laughingly says they're for people who want to boast about their fertility. I don't understand the point of them."

Other reactions were: "They make me cringe", "hideous and distracting" and "they give the finger to all those people who can't have children".

What do you think of the My Family stickers? Tell us below

A news.com.au reporter snapped this stick figure parody. Source: NewsComAu

Up popped pictures of the many My Family parodies: a T-Rex chasing a stick family, a woman with three kids and two pets and an empty space with the words "position open". I've seen single dad ones too and a set with dad in jail.

One person posted a picture she'd taken in a carpark of a sticker featuring the head of grumpy Agnes Brown, of the hit TV show Mrs Brown's Boys, with the slogan "Feck your stick figure family".

Another wrote: "I liked them, but our dilemma is we are both on second marriages and have kids and some have partners but not married, so do we put them (on) or not? So much angst over cartoon characters, LOL."

And for many, that seems to nail their problem: we don't like to be told what a real "family" looks like or that you have to have one that resembles the standard set to be successful at life.

Each to their own ... We're not sure how the driver sees out of this ute! Source: News Limited

Though the Gold Coast couple who invented My Family were also on their second marriages and both had children, the ongoing backlash seems to be about the fact family is so fluid now that the nuclear model is too limited.

We take our domestic status so seriously that those stick figures cause more tongue-poking even than the posh private school coats of arms you see on BMWs, or the stickers featuring the postcode of the exclusive seaside town where your spare house is at "the beach".

The article that caught my eye suggested the backlash that has followed the stickers to the US is because that "conga line of figures ... provides smug proof of affluence, busyness and procreative prowess". It went on: "Few trends reveal shifting family values in a mobile, personal-branding-obsessed society as do family stick figures."

The author noted a "quiet but visual culture war" raging between drivers, as seen in the big variety of send-ups, put-downs and even abusive sticker collections dissing Your Family.

One of the My Family parodies going around. Source: Supplied

A picture shared on The Perch. Source: Supplied

They do have their defenders: "We have them on our car and it's not to boast about my fertility ... It just so happens that my children think they are cute and fun," wrote one of my page pals. "I didn't realise there were so many sensitive people out there who spend their time imagining what other people do with their lives."

Another said: "I don't quite understand why people are worried about what sticker a complete stranger has on their car. I must have missed something somewhere.

"My theory is that it comes back to either a 'mummy wars' mentality or a 'keeping up with the Joneses' mentality. A bizarre combination of guilt/pride/jealousy ...???"

Whatever your stance on their quiet symbolism, or potentially annoying message, you can't disagree with this: "I may not be a fan, but I wish I had invented them."

The now-wealthy creators of the My Family stickers, Monica Liebenow and Phil Barham Source: News Limited

What do you think of the My Family stickers? Share your thoughts in the comments below


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Pro tips: How to avoid cooking disasters

Kitchen queen Maggie Beer cooks you her favourite recipe you can create in your own home.

Queen of food Maggie Beer has given her top tips on success in the kitchen. Source: Supplied

SHE admits she rarely follows a recipe and yet appears the picture of calm under pressure.

And now MasterChef guest judge Maggie Beer has dished the dirt on what Aussies get wrong in the kitchen and revealed the tricks to making our cooking lives easier.

As I sit down to interview one of Australia's favourite chefs at her farm shop, a toddler screams in the background, not once but constantly.

Then the scream gets louder as hot chocolate is dropped on the floor, then even louder when she falls off a chair. And then she is then pecked by a chicken.

While I'm dying of embarrassment at my child's behaviour, Beer remains a picture of calm.

So if a screaming toddler doesn't rattle her nerves does anything?

According to one of Australia's favourite chefs, cooking should never be a stressful experience and instead should be shared and enjoyed, especially when friends are concerned.

She said simple tricks and tips could turn even the worst cook into a wizz in the kitchen and you didn't have to be a MasterChef to do it.

From simple advice on how to cook a chicken to what the heck is verjuice, Beer dishes up some of the secrets behind her success.

1. Buy fresh and seasonal

Firstly the mother-of two says freshly picked produce can turn an average dish into a winner. And choosing seasonal food means it will be cheaper too.

"The flavour of food which has just been picked can make a huge difference," she said.

According to the cook, fresh is not only best but much tastier. Source: Supplied

2. Don't be scared to deviate from a recipe

Beer said she rarely followed a strict recipe instead preferring to cook by feel.

But she said they could be a good guide, and cooks should work a recipe around the food they have rather than strictly using everything in the book.

"Go to the markets and see what you like," she said.

"Then find a recipe you like and adapt it to you. Pick one food which shines on the dish."

3. Get your friends chopping

Beer reckons even dinner parties should be stress free. According to her a simple trick like cooking a lamb roast on 100 degrees for seven hours will not only leave the meat "like butter" but will win your mates over with its succulence.

And while you're busy dishing up the meat, she reckons get your guests onto chopping and veggie duties leaving all the little jobs to them, leaving you to concentrate on the bigger picture — the main event.

"Not only will you be more relaxed but your guests will feel they've played a part in the meal," she says.

Beer insists cooking should never be stressful. Source: Supplied

4. Don't overcook the food

Beer reckons the biggest food sin Aussies commit is overcooking food. Cooks afraid of serving undercooked meat can buy a thermometer if they're not sure.

And she has shared her secret for a smashing roast chicken every time, warning if you overcook the bird you'll end up with dry meat.

She said a bird is cooked perfectly after it is rested and sitting around 67 degrees.

"You need to rest the chook for between 20 and 30 minutes," she said.

"Once cooked turn it upside down and allow the juices to flow back in."

And she reckons a simple pour of verjuice about three quarters into the cooking process will add that extra zing to really make your dish shine.

5. Don't be scared to use extra touches like verjuice. Hang on, what is verjuice?

Beer, who was the first to produce the stuff commercially in Australia, reckons this simple stuff is as important as salt and can massively enhance a dish's flavour.

Made from the juice of unripened grapes, verjuice is a gentle acid that heightens the flavour of food.

"You can add it to stock, use it to make jelly or pour it over roasts," she says.

According to Beer, it's like salt and adds flavour to everything.

Verjuice adds flavour to everything, but what is it again? Picture: maggiebeer.com.au Source: Supplied

6. Don't be scared of making mistakes or starting again if disaster strikes

There's no such thing as a wrong dish as such, Beer reckons, but if disaster really does strike then start again.

"If you've done something wrong to stuff it up think back to what you did so next time you can fix it," she says.

"It just comes down to experience and confidence."

7. Have a good pantry and equipment

Having the basic ingredients ready and available and the right equipment such as a good pan can also make the world of difference.

It means less stress as cooks are better organised, so if something does go wrong you can take a different tact or at least have everything out ready to start again.

So while my hopes of getting a picture with the kitchen queen faded quicker than my toddler's screaming did, at least I walked away with a bit of knowledge which would help me next time I picked up a pan.

I also learnt something else — never work with kids or animals.

Beer pictured with fellow MasterChef stars Matt Preston, Kylie Kwong, Alla Wolf-Tasker, George Calombaris and Gary Mehigan. Source: Supplied


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Ex-fashion magnate to sue over ‘sex slave’ case

Ex CEO and founder of American Apparel Dov Charney is set to sue the company after being ousted. Source: Supplied

CALL IT "The Case of the Smutty Blog: Part 2."

A short-lived blog from spring 2011 that showed naked pictures of an ex-American Apparel employee is at the centre of another looming lawsuit — this time from Dov Charney, who is fighting back against his sudden ouster as CEO by the board.

The controversial founder is expected to sue the retailer in the coming days, charging he was wrongfully terminated last week over trumped-up charges related to the blog, sources told The Post.

His ousting is related to the case of Irene Morales, who had unsuccessfully accused Charney of making her his "sex slave."

The board cited allegations that Charney had allowed a former employee to create a 2011 blog with nude pictures of Morales purported to be authored by her, sources said.

American Apparel has made a name for itself with racy advertising. Source: AFP

But Charney is expected to argue that he had no knowledge of the blog before it was published, and therefore isn't responsible for legal liability cited by the company, insiders said.

Moreover, Charney's lawyers note that the board renewed his employment contract in April 2012, more than a year after the allegations surfaced.

As reported by The Post, American Apparel's liability in the Morales case has been well short of the $260 million she had originally sought in her sensational lawsuit.

In fact, it was Morales this spring who was ordered by an arbitration judge to pay American Apparel $800,000 in damages for appearing on NBC's "Today" to accuse him of sexual harassment, sources said.

Morales' case appeared to get complicated after The Post revealed that she had been sending filthy photos of herself to Charney long after she left the company, coupling them with saucy come-ons, according to company lawyers.

Clothing on display inside a store in New York. Source: AFP

At the same time, however, American Apparel this spring was ordered to pay $1 million to Morales on charges that the blog had violated a 2010 California law that prohibits the public impersonation of another person, sources said.

Charney's lawyers are expected to argue the $200,000 difference falls well short of the "material" liability that the board has claimed, although insiders said American Apparel may also be liable for about $500,000 in legal fees.

Charney's lawyers also will likely counter that several board members as well as the company's legal counsel had been aware of the strategy to fight Morales' case by publishing the provocative photos she had e-mailed to Charney, undermining her allegations of harassment.

In this 2003 file photo, Dov Charney announces he will shutter his manufacturing plant to observe an economic strike by Latinos. Source: AP

One source close to Charney said the T-shirt magnate has characterised his surprise ouster as a "power grab" in which the board has attempted to cheat him out of a $23.8 million severance called for under his contract.

Last week, sources said the board instead offered him a four-year consulting gig worth $1 million a year — an offer that Charney refused.

Reached Sunday, co-chairman Allan Mayer said, "We remain confident that we did the right thing, for the right reasons, in the right way."

This article originally appeared on The New York Post and is republished here with permission.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Baby saves woman from death

A woman sentenced to death in Sudan after marrying a Christian may be soon released according to reports.

A SUDANESE woman who gave birth in prison after being sentenced to death for converting to Christianity, has been set free.

The case of Meriam Yahia Ibrahim Ishag sparked an outcry from Western governments and rights groups after a judge sentenced her to hang on May 15.

The young 27-year-old physician, was convicted under the Islamic sharia law that has been in force in Sudan since 1983 and makes conversions of faith punishable by death.

"Meriam was released just about an hour ago," Mohanad Mustafa told AFP.

GIVES BIRTH: Brave Meriam has baby before planned execution

DEATH SENTENCE: Meriam Ibrahim Ishag's husband to appeal

Spared from death ... Meriam Ibrahim, sitting next to Martin, her 18-month-old son, holds her newborn baby girl that she gave birth to in jail. She was recently visited by a Sudanese NGO. Picture: Al Fajer Source: AP

"She's now out of prison," he said, but authorities will not issue the reasons for her release yet.

Looking well ... Meriam Ibrahim breastfeeds her newborn baby girl that she gave birth to in jail. Picture: Al Fajer Source: AP

Born to a Muslim father and an Ethiopian Orthodox Christian mother, she married Daniel Wani.

Wani was pronounced innocent but their marriage was revoked and his wife was sentenced to 100 lashes as the court considered his wife a Muslim.

She was subsequently sentenced to death after being found guilty of apostasy (publicly renouncing Islam) when she told the court she was a Christian and refused to "return" to the Muslim religion.

"I am a Christian, and I have never been a Muslim," she said in court.

Relieved ... Daniel Wani with his wife Meriam Yehya Ibrahim who has been sentenced to death for refusing to renounce her Christian faith. Picture: Gabriel Wani/Facebook Source: Supplied

Twelve days after the verdict, Ishag gave birth to a daughter at the women's prison in Khartoum's twin city of Omdurman.

Wani, who is in a wheelchair, was allowed to visit his wife and son before the birth.

Meriam reportedly told him before the birth that she would rather die than give up her Christianity.

"If they want to execute me then they should go ahead and do it because I'm not going to change my faith," she told him.

Before she was released, Ishag was supposed to be executed after she nursed the baby for two years while in prison.

European Union leaders called for revocation of the "inhumane verdict," while US Secretary of State John Kerry urged Khartoum to repeal its laws banning Muslims from converting.

British Prime Minister David Cameron said the way she had been treated was "barbaric and has no place in today's world".

Mustafa and four other human rights lawyers handling her case for free had appealed the verdict but word of her release was unexpected.

Mustafa had said he still had no idea when the appeal court might render a verdict.

"It's great," a church source said of her release, after last week expressing optimism that she would be freed because of international pressure on Sudan.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Pig out! Peppa not welcome in UK

Written By Unknown on Senin, 16 Juni 2014 | 23.18

Not welcome ... UK customs destroyed a Peppa Pig costume because it violated intellectual property rights. Source: Supplied

THERE are set to be a whole bunch of disappointed children after Peppa Pig was detained at customs in the UK and banned from entering.

The children's TV character was one of the headline acts at the Priory Park Playgroup's Summer Fair in Cambridge but will now be a no show.

Fundraising manager Kelly Holmes told Cambridge News that she bought a Peppa Pig costume from China for 210 pounds ($380) and that it was confiscated and destroyed upon arrival in the UK because it was deemed to violate intellectual property rights.

"I thought I'd probably have to dress up and a few of us were going to take it in turns but we needed a costume so I bought one on eBay", she told Cambridge News.

"It said official Peppa Pig and it was more expensive than the others. It said it was available in the UK and it had good ratings."

"The border force wrote to me saying Peppa Pig's been detained at customs," the 35 -year-old added, "They confirmed it should be destroyed.

"Obviously I was very upset for the children. We'd already advertised that Peppa Pig was coming."

Ms Holmes said she hopes to get a refund from the seller through eBay after raising the issue, but her main focus is to rescue the Summer Fair.

"We're hoping Peppa can still be there in some form and if not then another mascot," she said.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Buck’s party finds prehistoric skull

A party to remember ... palaeontologist Gary Morgan stands over a the fossil of a stegomastodon skull discovered in a remote area of Elephant Butte State Park, New Mexico. Source: AP

A GROUP of men attending a bachelor party in New Mexico have stumbled on a three-million-year-old mastodon skull.

The Telegraph reports the partygoers were hiking through Elephant Buttle Lake State Park, outside Albuquerque — deep in Breaking Bad territory — when they saw what they appeared to be a giant bone poking out of the sand.

When the men started digging, the perfectly preserved skull emerged from the desert best known as Walter White's old stamping ground.

Maybe if they'd kept going, they could have found one of his stray barrels of money?

In an unusually responsible move for a bachelor party, the group, thinking they had found the remains of a woolly mammoth, sent photos of the fossils to the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science.

In fact, the bones belonged to a stegomastodon — an even older ancestor of today's elephant that became extinct about 10,000 years ago.

An archeology group dug up the 450-kilogram skull — which likely belonged to a six-tonne creature that stood around 2.7 metres tall — and took it back to the museum for further study.

"This mastodon find is older than the woolly mammoth that tread the Earth in the Ice Age," said Gary Morgan, a palaeontologist at the museum. "It probably died on a sandbar of the ancient Rio Grande River.

"This is far and away the best one we've ever found."

For Antonia Gradillas, who was out with the group celebrating their friend's upcoming wedding, the buck's party will be one to remember (unlike most others).

"This is the coolest thing ever," he said. "Some people with PhDs in this field might not even have this kind of opportunity. We were so lucky."

It sure beats finding a tiger in your bathroom.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Are they spraying shaving cream on the pitch?

A World Cup referee uses vanishing spray in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Source: AP

An own goal gifts Argentina an early lead but in a courageous 90 minutes from underdogs Bosnia-Herzegovina only some Messi magic could seal the win for La Albiceleste - The white and Sky Blue

WORLD Cup viewers around the globe are asking the same question right now: what is that magical vanishing spray the referees are using on the field?

Referees are using a spray similar to shaving foam to stop defenders from edging closer to the ball during free-kicks in Brazil.

Japanese referee Yuichi Nishimura sprays a line after calling for a free kick during the World Cup opener between Croatia and Brazil. Source: AFP

The ref sprays the water-based foam in a circle around the ball, walks 10 yards and sprays another line that the defenders need to stand behind.

Then, magically, the spray vanishes.

Well, maybe not magically. The can contains water and butane gas. The butane expands when the pressure changes and quickly evaporates, leaving just the water on the ground.

Ivorian referee Noumandiez Doue sprays a free kick marker on the pitch during a Group B football match between Chile and Australia. Source: AFP

Players, constantly looking for any advantage they can get, would often encroach on the 10-yard area they are supposed to stand behind, but this measure allows referees to police the problem much more easily.

The product has been used in domestic leagues in Brazil and Argentina but is making its first appearance — and disappearance — at international level.

Referee Wilmar Roldan sprays the temporary line for a free kick as Benjamin Moukandjo and Enoh Eyong of Cameroon form a wall. Source: Getty Images

Australian referee Ben Williams joked it was like "pulling a can of Mace", while English official Howard Webb suggested it could lead to more goals being scored from set pieces.

"It will assist us in getting the players back at a free-kick and, in turn, that gives the attacking team a better opportunity of creating something from that set piece," Webb told the BBC.

Unsurprisingly, the spray has become a hit on social media. A Facebook page is dedicated to it and there is no shortage of memes.

... It does now. Source: Twitter


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Couple killed by ex at reunion

Revenge ... Lori Moore and Lance Griffel were shot dead by Moore's ex husband at her high school reunion. Source: Supplied

LORI Moore was introducing her new boyfriend Lance Griffel to her old friends at their high school reunion on Saturday when her ex-husband arrived and shot the pair dead.

Moore, 33, and her new love Lance Griffel, 36, were attending an East Peoria Community High School reunion in Illinois for the class of 1999 when James Moore, 40, calmly walked in to the Fifth Quarter Sports Bar and Pizzeria and shot them both in the head.

An off-duty FBI officer then shot the gunman dead in front of about 100 startled witnesses at around 8pm.

Sir Lancelot ... Lori Moore was smitten by her new boyfriend Lance Griffel. Source: Supplied

Ms Moore and Griffel were rushed to hospital where they were pronounced dead.

Ms Moore had filed for divorce from her husband in March last year and it was finalised two months later.

East Peoria Police Chief Dick Ganschow told the Pekin Times that had it not been for the quick thinking of the FBI officer, the situation could have been even more tragic.

"It's very difficult to say. You can play the 'what if' game over and over again, but I think it's pretty clear in his case the presence of this officer and his ability to take very quick and very decisive action prevented a further tragedy," he said.

Ms Moore was clearly smitten by her new beau, posting on Facebook earlier this month a picture of the two and calling him Sir Lancelot.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Teen opens sneaker pawn shop for $16,000 shoes

A pair of Nike Air Yeezys — Kanye West's signature sneakers — are currently selling from $1,700 to $15,000 on eBay. Source: Supplied

FORGET stocks. Sneaker futures are making Wall Street look like a swap meet.

High-end kicks are becoming the currency of choice in New York, and one 16-year-old is taking advantage of the trend — using his own five-figure stock of 45 mint-condition basketball shoes to open the world's first sneaker pawn shop.

"Young kids don't have jewellery. They don't have cars," said Troy Reed, dad of young entrepreneur Chase "Sneakers" Reed. "But what they do have is thousands of dollars worth of sneakers in their house."

Chase, a 10th-grader at Frederick Douglass Academy in Harlem, still marvels over pictures of the freshest sneaker designs online and waits in line for hours to add to his collection. Only now he and his father are also getting them from fellow "investors" who want quick cash.

They have all sorts of reasons for selling short. One pawned fancy footwear to pay for his brother's funeral. Two teen girls liquidated their sneakers to pay for prom dresses. Another savvy ­investor flipped a pair of LeBron Crown Jewels and two pairs of Jordans and used the thousands in profit to pay for his move to The Bronx from Brooklyn.

The store's priciest pawned pairs so far — those Crown Jewels — are commanding $AU1,490; more than five times the $287 sticker price.

LeBron James' Crown Jewels sneakers go for $1490. Source: AFP

"I don't look at it like a business. It's what I do. It's what I breathe," said Chase. "It's an idea that's right in front of your face. It's just about bringing the idea to life."

During school hours, his father and their sneaker-maven pal Rahsaan "Uncle Bless" Capers man the shop at Lenox Avenue and West 120th Street. They're looking for "high-end sneakers or dead-stock sneakers" — pairs that are no longer being manufactured. If a prospective pawner's kicks qualify, they give the shoes a whiff, check to see if they're yellowing and examine the soles for excessive wear.

"After we evaluate it, we'll give the kid, say, $US100 for the sneakers. If he wants them back, he'll pay the $US100, plus $US20 for storing the sneakers," Troy said.

If someone makes an ­offer, the pawner is notified and has the right of first refusal, provided they can pony up the cash. If the sneakers sell for more, the pawner keeps 80 per cent of the profit and the rest goes to the store.

A lightly worn pair's value can jump exponentially compared to its initial retail price. A pair of Nike Air Yeezys — Kanye West's signature sneakers — are currently selling from $1,810 to $15,971 on eBay. Originally, they went for $279. Kanye's own purported pair of Yeezys are going for $53,231.

The original Nike Air Jordons from 1985. Source: AP

Capers, who owns three pairs of Yeezys, said he has been offered close to $18,100 for the trio — a better profit margin than ­Apple stock.

"I'm still not ready to bring them in yet," he laughed. "I'm waiting for a sneaker expo first."

The $31,938 in seed money for Sneaker Pawn came from Chase selling off his own collection — which peaked at 200 pairs.

He and his dad came up with the idea when Chase asked to borrow $53 spending money after waiting all night to dole out his ­father's hard-earned cash on a new release.

"I was like, 'Are you serious?' I'm holding these sneakers until I get my $53 back," said Troy Reed, who got his start in business making and selling documentaries about Harlem druglords like Alpo and Rich Porter.

But Chase didn't just plant the seed for the idea or help raise start-up money. After school, he does homework and then stays up late custom-painting sneakers. Typically, he'll earn between $159 to $266 for each custom paint job.

"Luckily when the store opened, school started slowing down," he said.

This article originally appeared on The New York Post.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Are they spraying shaving cream on the pitch?

A World Cup referee uses vanishing spray in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Source: AP

An own goal gifts Argentina an early lead but in a courageous 90 minutes from underdogs Bosnia-Herzegovina only some Messi magic could seal the win for La Albiceleste - The white and Sky Blue

WORLD Cup viewers around the globe are asking the same question right now: what is that magical vanishing spray the referees are using on the field?

Referees are using a spray similar to shaving foam to stop defenders from edging closer to the ball during free-kicks in Brazil.

Japanese referee Yuichi Nishimura sprays a line after calling for a free kick during the World Cup opener between Croatia and Brazil. Source: AFP

The ref sprays the water-based foam in a circle around the ball, walks 10 yards and sprays another line that the defenders need to stand behind.

Then, magically, the spray vanishes.

Well, maybe not magically. The can contains water and butane gas. The butane expands when the pressure changes and quickly evaporates, leaving just the water on the ground.

Ivorian referee Noumandiez Doue sprays a free kick marker on the pitch during a Group B football match between Chile and Australia. Source: AFP

Players, constantly looking for any advantage they can get, would often encroach on the 10-yard area they are supposed to stand behind, but this measure allows referees to police the problem much more easily.

The product has been used in domestic leagues in Brazil and Argentina but is making its first appearance — and disappearance — at international level.

Referee Wilmar Roldan sprays the temporary line for a free kick as Benjamin Moukandjo and Enoh Eyong of Cameroon form a wall. Source: Getty Images

Australian referee Ben Williams joked it was like "pulling a can of Mace", while English official Howard Webb suggested it could lead to more goals being scored from set pieces.

"It will assist us in getting the players back at a free-kick and, in turn, that gives the attacking team a better opportunity of creating something from that set piece," Webb told the BBC.

Unsurprisingly, the spray has become a hit on social media. A Facebook page is dedicated to it and there is no shortage of memes.

... It does now. Source: Twitter


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Byron scalded in pigeon challenge

Byron gets emotional after presenting his dish to the judges. Courtesy: MasterChef

HE may be MasterChef's resident hottie, but Byron wasn't saucy enough to beat Amy and Tash in a roast pigeon elimination challenge on Monday night.

Aussie women are in mourning after MasterChef Australia heartthrob Byron Finnerty was eliminated tonight.

The 27-year-old deckhand has been a favourite with female TV viewers ever since he began on the Channel 10 cooking show, after leaving his job and girlfriend for his food dream.

The Victorian hottie was eliminated in a cook-off against Amy Shields and Tash Shan with the three charged with creating Marco Pierre White's roast pigeon with a ravioli of mushrooms in 90 minutes.

MEET BYRON: MasterChef's resident hottie

MASTERCHEF FAVOURITE: Booted over raw chook

Needing help ... Marco Pierre White gives contestant Byron Finnerty some advice. Source: Channel 10

Byron's undoing was the lack of enough sauce — the most important element of the dish as it unites the other elements on the plate.

"I'm sorry I couldn't have done a bit better for (female fans)," Byron told News Corp Australia. "I was really hoping to go further. I was really trying. I put everything in to tonight. I couldn't have given it anymore."

The good news for Aussie ladies is that Byron is single — even though romance isn't at the forefront of his mind right at the moment.

"It (attention from female fans) has been surprising for me," Byron admits. "I'm not massive on Twitter and other social media so it was a shock. I'm single. I'm slowly working myself back into it (dating) but I'm in no rush. I'm not actively searching."

The past two nights ofMasterChef — Sunday night was an Italian invention test — have seen contestants wilt in the face of White's imposing presence. On Sunday night Byron was in tears after getting flustered under White's steely gaze, but was taken aside for a pep talk by the acclaimed chef.

It wasn't enough.

Byron admits that nerves again clearly got the better of him tonight.

"Marco is the bastion," Byron says. "I was really nervous going in. I got in trouble because I was trying to reach for the stars and in doing that I shot myself in the foot.

"If I had just settled on simple food done really well and not tried to overthink things and mess around with stuff too much I would have done a lot better."

The pressure started early when, clearly intimidated to be cooking for White, Byron spent 20 minutes breaking down White's recipe in the pursuit of perfection. In the meantime Amy and Tash began cooking.

Wasting time ... Byron spends too long picking apart Marco Pierre White's roast pigeon recipe. Source: Channel 10

White was concerned that all three contestants were slow to start their sauce. Later Tash and Byron came under fire to get their mushrooms on so that they could cool in time to be combined with the ravioli filling.

At one point White tells Byron: "If you panic, I'll start to panic."

It was a race against the clock towards the end with Tash struggling to roll out her pasta dough after adding too much oil, and Byron scalding his hands at the last minute after scooping baby turnips out of boiling water.

The judges — White as well as Matt Preston, George Calombaris and Gary Mehigan — praised Amy's dish. Tash was criticised for undercooked lentils. In the end, though, Bryon hit bottom because of the lack of enough sauce.

Elimination time ... Byron, Amy and Tash await their verdict. Source: Channel 10

"I learnt so much about myself throughout this competition," Byron says. "I had a fair idea that this (food) was what I wanted to do but I needed (confirmation).

"My whole idea before the show was to get into the food industry and being on the show has cemented that dream."


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

‘We left White House broke, in debt’

Written By Unknown on Senin, 09 Juni 2014 | 23.18

In the poor house ... Hillary Clinton, seen here with husband Bill and daughter Chelsea, says her family had no money when they left the White House and were in significant debt. Source: AP

FORMER US First Lady Hillary Clinton has made the extraordinary claim that she and husband Bill Clinton were not only broke when they left the White House but in serious debt.

Clinton was defending herself and her husband charging $US200,000 a pop ($215,000) for speaking engagements since they left 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in 2001.

"We came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt," she told US ABC's Diane Sawyer. "We had no money when we got there, and we struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages, for houses, for Chelsea's education."

Clinton is promoting her book Hard Choices ahead of what many believe will be her own run for the White House in 2016.

Former US President Bill Clinton with wife Hillary, daughter Chelsea and dog Buddy at the White House in 1998. Source: AFP

CNN reported that Bill Clinton had earned $US106 million in fees from speaking engagements since leaving the White House and made $US17 million from 72 speeches in 2012 alone.

It said he had once charged $US750,000 for a single speech.

"Bill has worked really hard - and it's been amazing to me - he's worked very hard,' Hillary Clinton said. "First of all, we had to pay off all our debts, which was, you know, he had to make double the money because of obviously taxes and then pay off the debts and get us houses and take care of family members."

The Clintons are believed to be worth between $US100 million and $US200 million currently.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Human face evolved to take a punch

Evolution ... A study by the University of Utah shows that the human face evolved to be able to take a punch, which is good news for Sergio Martinez who is seen here taking a belting from Miguel Cotto during their Middleweight Championship fight. Source: AFP

FIVE million years of slugging it out with fists has left its mark on the human face, scientists believe. Evidence suggests it evolved to minimise damage from bruising altercations after our ancient ancestors learned how to throw a punch.

Researchers studied the bone structure of australopiths, apelike bipeds living four to five million years ago that predated the modern human primate family Homo.

They found that australopith faces and jaws were strongest in just those areas most likely to receive a blow from a fist.

It is a legacy that continues to this day, helping to explain why men's faces are more robust than women's, say the scientists. Just as they are today, men were the less gentle of the sexes at the dawn of human evolution, and more likely to get into the prehistoric equivalent of a bar fight.

US lead researcher Dr David Carrier, from the University of Utah, said: "The australopiths were characterised by a suite of traits that may have improved fighting ability, including hand proportions that allow formation of a fist; effectively turning the delicate musculoskeletal system of the hand into a club effective for striking.

"If indeed the evolution of our hand proportions were associated with selection for fighting behaviour you might expect the primary target, the face, to have undergone evolution to better protect it from injury when punched." The study, published in the journal Biological Reviews , builds on previous work indicating that violence played a greater role in human evolution than many experts would like to admit.

Changing faces ... A University of Utah study shows that human faces — especially those of our australopith ancestors — evolved to minimise injury from punches to the face during fights between males. Source: Supplied

In recent years, biologist Dr Carrier has investigated the short legs of great apes, the bipedal posture of humans, and the hand proportions of "hominins", or early human species. He argues that these traits evolved, to a large extent, around the need to fight. "When modern humans fight hand-to-hand, the face is usually the primary target," said Dr Carrier, commenting on the latest research.

"What we found was that the bones that suffer the highest rates of fracture in fights are the same parts of the skull that exhibited the greatest increase in robusticity during the evolution of basal hominins.

"These bones are also the parts of the skull that show the greatest difference between males and females in both australopiths and humans. In other words, male and female faces are different because the parts of the skull that break in fights are bigger in males." Co-author Dr Michael Morgan, a University of Utah physician, said: "I think our science is sound and fills some longstanding gaps in the existing theories of why the musculoskeletal structures of our faces developed the way they did.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Tomic wins first match since January

Bernard Tomic has won in three sets against American journeyman Tim Smyczek at Queen's. Source: AP

BERNARD Tomic's long stint in the main draw wilderness is over — but only just — after the Queenslander survived a ferocious challenge from American journeyman Tim Smyczek.

Smyczek served for the first-round contest at 5-4 in the deciding set before fading to a 6-4 3-6 7-5 first-round AEGON Championships defeat at Queen's Club.

Tomic's serve saved the 2011 Wimbledon quarter-finalist from the ignominy of losing to world No 106 Smyczek, who had never won a match on London grass.

If not for a dab of Tomic late-match brilliance, Smyczek would be facing either Czech Radek Stepanek or Kazakhstan's Mikhail Kukushkin for a place in the third round.

Unable to win a main draw match since reaching the Sydney final in early January, Tomic clouted 10 aces and landed an impressive 77 per cent of first serves.

But his glacial movement was repeatedly exposed by journeyman's Smyczeck's superior fitness.

In the end, Tomic's raw talent got him across the line. But it was a near thing.

Realising his tournament was in peril, Tomic pocketed 12 of the final 13 points with a mix of power and finesse — and a large hint of a desperate gambler.

He shook his head in disbelief after claiming the 93-minute contest as his oafish father and coach John stalked from court 1, glaring at Australian reporters.

Tomic has endured a rough run since falling to Juan Martin Del Potro in the Sydney final, retiring mid-match in the first round of the Australian to Rafael Nadal before undergoing double hip surgery.

Resuming prematurely in Miami, where he was destroyed in a world record 28 minutes by Finn Jarkko Nieminen, Tomic lost all four European claycourt matches in either the first round or qualifying.

His ranking now sits at world No 80.

New South Welshmam James Duckworth engineered a remarkable win, overcoming a terrible start to upstage Israeli Dudi Sela 0-6 7-6 (7-5) 6-4.

Duckworth's victory earned the fiesty right-hander a shot at second seed and world No 6 Tomas Berdych.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Morgan ’more responsive’ after surgery

A US truck driver has been charged in connection to a car crash that left Tracy Morgan critically injured

Long stay ... Morgan is likely to be in hospital for several weeks, a spokesman said. Picture: Greg Allen Source: AP

ACTOR and comedian Tracy Morgan will stay in hospital "for several weeks" after he was involved in fatal car crash in New Jersey.

The 30 Rock star remains in critical condition but is "more responsive" post-surgery, his spokesman Lewis Kay said.

Morgan, 45, was returning from a stand-up performance in Delaware when a truck smashed into the back of his chauffeured limo bus on the New Jersey Turnpike, authorities said, setting off a chain-reaction crash that left one member of his entourage dead and two others seriously hurt.

The former Saturday Night Live cast member is recovering in hospital after surgery on a broken leg. Mr Kay said Morgan also sustained a broken femur, broken nose and several broken ribs.

Morgan's family was "tremendously overwhelmed and appreciative of the outpouring of love and support from his fans", he said.

A Wal-Mart truck driver from Georgia has been charged with death by auto and four counts of assault by auto.

Accident scene ... Morgan's overturned limousine bus on the New Jersey Turnpike. Source: AP

Authorities said Kevin Roper, 35, apparently failed to slow for traffic ahead early on Saturday in Cranbury Township and swerved at the last minute to avoid a crash.

A report in the New York Daily News cited a Twitter account in Mr Roper's name with the motto, "Move or get hit!" According to the paper, the chilling words, which were in the bio section and were later deleted from the account.

But a spokesman for Wal-Mart denied the account belonged to Mr Roper telling the Mail Online that their employee had no presence on social media.

Mr Roper's big rig crashed into the back of Morgan's Mercedes limo bus, authorities said, killing comedian James "Jimmy Mack" McNair and critically injuring Morgan's assistant Jeffrey Millea and another comedian Ardie Fuqua Jr.

Charged ... Kevin Roper has been charged with one count of death by auto and four counts of assault by auto following the accident. Picture: Middlesex County Police Source: Supplied

The limo bus driver, Tyrone Gale, told ABC News he was disoriented after the vehicle flipped over and could hear Morgan yelling for help.

"I climbed around and heard Tracy screaming for help," Mr Gale said.

"I climbed up on the body of the limo bus ... but I couldn't reach them."

Mr Roper, accompanied by his lawyer, turned himself in to state police.

He was released on $US50,000 ($54,097) bail on Saturday night and placed on administrative leave, a Wal-Mart spokesman said.

TV success ... Morgan with fellow 30 Rock cast members Alec Baldwin and Tina Fey. Source: News Corp Australia

Wal-Mart President Bill Simon said in a statement the company "will take full responsibility" if authorities determine its truck caused the accident.

The National Transportation Safety Board is working with state police to look at any issues in the crash related to commercial trucking and limousine safety.

Six vehicles were involved in the pileup, but no one from the other cars was injured.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

‘We left White House broke, in debt’

In the poor house ... Hillary Clinton, seen here with husband Bill and daughter Chelsea, says her family had no money when they left the White House and were in significant debt. Source: AP

FORMER US First Lady Hillary Clinton has made the extraordinary claim that she and husband Bill Clinton were not only broke when they left the White House but in serious debt.

Clinton was defending herself and her husband charging $US200,000 a pop ($215,000) for speaking engagements since they left 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in 2001.

"We came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt," she told US ABC's Diane Sawyer. "We had no money when we got there, and we struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages, for houses, for Chelsea's education."

Clinton is promoting her book Hard Choices ahead of what many believe will be her own run for the White House in 2016.

Former US President Bill Clinton with wife Hillary, daughter Chelsea and dog Buddy at the White House in 1998. Source: AFP

CNN reported that Bill Clinton had earned $US106 million in fees from speaking engagements since leaving the White House and made $US17 million from 72 speeches in 2012 alone.

It said he had once charged $US750,000 for a single speech.

"Bill has worked really hard - and it's been amazing to me - he's worked very hard,' Hillary Clinton said. "First of all, we had to pay off all our debts, which was, you know, he had to make double the money because of obviously taxes and then pay off the debts and get us houses and take care of family members."

The Clintons are believed to be worth between $US100 million and $US200 million currently.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger