Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Bernie who? Why Tomic’s time is over

Written By Unknown on Senin, 30 Juni 2014 | 23.18

Youngster Nick Kyrgios says he has 'nothing to lose' when he takes on tennis heavy weight Rafael Nadal in the fourth round of Wimbledon tonight.

He had nine lives but don't call him a cat. Australia's Nick Kyrgios celebrates beating France's Richard Gasquet after saving nine match points at the 2014 Wimbledon Championships. AFP PHOTO / ANDREW COWIE Source: AFP

THERE'S a great story from a couple of years back about 19-year-old Australian tennis prodigy Nick Kyrgios, who tomorrow faces Rafael Nadal in the fourth round at Wimbledon.

Kyrgios was practising with Lleyton Hewitt at the Australian Open on a typically dry, scorching Melbourne summer day. He was desperate for a drink but Lleyton wouldn't "let" him have one.

It's not that Hewitt expressly forbade Kyrgios to go for his drink bottle. It's that Hewitt wasn't stopping for a drink and Kyrgios didn't want to seem presumptuous, arrogant or weak by comparison.

"It was a nightmare, I wanted a drink for 45 minutes but I was scared to initiate it," he recalled this week.

The moral of the story is simple: can you imagine Bernard Tomic ever behaving that way? Forget lapping a few drops of water, Tomic probably would have stopped for a lapdance halfway through the practice session.

Unlike Tomic, Nick Kyrgios is genuinely hungry for success. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant) Source: NewsComAu

The arrival this week of Nick Kyrgios as a genuine tennis sensation is an event most tennis fans have long been waiting for. At last, we no longer have to pretend we like Bernard Tomic.

Kyrgios, if you missed it, saved a record-equalling nine match points in his epic five-set upset of French star Richard Gasquet. In the final game, Kyrgios blew Gasquet away. Tomic would have just blown a gasket.

To date, Kyrgios has boomed more aces (76) than anyone else at this year's Wimbledon. But he has shown a promising array of strokes to back up his power, showing frequent deft touches. The guy's got a subtle sense of humour too.

Fourteen plus zero equals 14. Nice maths, Nick!

The last couple of years have been tough for Aussie tennis fans as we've watched Bernard Tomic occasionally show his talent, but mostly abuse it, mock it, waste it. The day he lost the quickest ever ATP game in about the time it takes to boil rice was just one of many low points.

Yet still we've cheered for him, hoping against hope that it's surely just a matter of time until his infantile mind catches up with his oversized body.

Hasn't happened yet and maybe it never will. Either way, it now scarcely matters because Nick Kyrgios is number one in our hearts. This likeable young Canberran has a lovely vibe about him. He's aggressive but controlled, a killer on the court and a puppy dog off it.

The last time Tomic cried like this was when he had to sell his orange sports car. AFP PHOTO / ANDREW COWIE Source: AFP

You've got to be half a bastard to win tennis matches, but only half. It also helps if you're a decent, well-rounded human being. Just ask Andre Agassi and Roger Federer and our own Pat Rafter, who all started their careers as angry young men, then started winning major trophies when they got their heads together.

Tomic may do likewise. There's still time for him. But that's for him to worry about now, not us, because the hopes of most Australians are now officially pinned on the shoulders of Nick Kyrgios.

"I'm just excited to be out there and have a chance to excite the crowd again," Kyrgios said after beating Gasquet.

Hear that? It's about us, not him, about what we feel not what he feels.

"Australia's history of tennis goes a long way back, but Pat Cash mentoring you and and Lleyton giving advice, it's always good having those tennis legends helping you," Kyrgios said in the same interview

Get that, Bernie? The kid takes advice.

Compare those quotes to an infamous interview Tomic did way back in 2007, aged just 14 when he said he wanted to have "the mind of Pete Sampras, the groundstrokes of Roger Federer and the heart of Lleyton Hewitt".

There seems to be a word missing before the word "head" on those bags. AFP PHOTO / GLYN KIRK Source: AFP

Bernard Tomic has always had big dreams and an even bigger ego. Now he's got the big ranking to go with it. He'll be somewhere above 100 after Wimbledon.

As for Kyrgios, he'll be double digits. And number one with a bullet in the hearts of Aussie tennis fans regardless of how he does against Nadal. One thing we can bank on: this match won't be over by the first commercial break.

Originally published as Bernie who? Why Tomic's time is over
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Gore to Abbott: Get out of the way

Former US Vice President Al Gore joined MP Clive Palmer to announce the Palmer United Party will vote to abolish the carbon tax in the Senate, and move for an Emissions Trading Scheme.

AL GORE has warned Tony Abbott to "change or get out of the way" of sensible environmental policy, labelling the Prime Minister a "straight-out climate denier".

Speaking to Vice after forging an unlikely alliance with Clive Palmer, the former US vice-president said "silly" initiatives like the government's direct action plan had "never worked anywhere."

Mr Gore also praised the Palmer United Party leader, who has backed a carbon emissions trading scheme with a starting price of zero dollars, but only if Australia's main trading partners adopt a similar mechanism, for putting forward a plan that was "so much better than would have been the case".

"He does have an unusual style," Mr Gore said of the Australian mining magnate. "But I think that whatever unusual features to his style there may be, deep down there's absolutely no question in my mind that he has a sense of social justice, he has a keen sense of right and wrong. ... He wants to make the world a better place."

Strange bedfellows ... Clive Palmer and former United States vice-president Al Gore at their press conference at Parliament House in Canberra. Source: News Corp Australia

Mr Gore also said Mr Abbott — a "straight-out climate denier" — would soon find himself on the wrong side of history.

"I think we're not far from a point where people will look back on climate denialists as extremely odd, self destructive," he said.

Mr Gore's message to the PM: "Please, either change or get out of the way. Because Australia wants to have the kind of sensible policies that the rest of the world is moving toward.

"It's coming. We've won this. The only question is how much time it's going to take and how much damage is going to be programmed into the climate system in the meantime."

Originally published as Gore to Abbott: Get out of the way

23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Rolf Harris found guilty

Under scrutiny ... Rolf Harris with his daughter Bindi after attending Southwark Crown Court in central London. Picture: Niklas Halle'n Source: AFP

ROLF Harris has been found guilty of sexually assaulting four teenage school girls over an almost 20-year period with a jury unanimously declaring him guilty on all charges in a sensational conclusion to his long running trial.

After eight days of deliberations as the trial entered its eighth week, the six man and six woman jury returned to court 2 of Southwark Crown Court in central London shortly after lunch (local time) to unanimously declare his guilt.

Verdict decided ... Rolf Harris arrives at Southwark Crown Court today in London, England. Picture: Danny E. Martindale Source: Getty Images

The 84-year-old Harris — a household name with more than 50 years in the music, art and TV entertainment industries — was expressionless as Judge Nigel Sweeney asked the jury forewoman for their verdict.

The legendary Australian entertainer showed no emotion as the jury forewoman said "guilty" on each count.

As he left the defendant's dock, Harris managed a reassuring nod and grimace for his family who held hands and comforted each other.

For seven weeks they had heard claims by the prosecution their loved one was a sinister pervert who groomed girls for abuse, and despite making audible remarks and head shakes while victims testified, yesterday they said nothing in the face of the verdict.

Guilty ... Harris arrives with his wife Alwen Hughes (2nd R) and daughter Bindi (L) at Southwark Crown Court in London before hearing the verdict. Picture: AFP Source: AFP

The family's spokesman Abel Hadden asked they be respected and not asked for comment.

"Following today's verdicts, we have been asked to make it clear that neither the Harris family, their lawyers, agents or friends will be making any public comments or being available for interview either here or in Australia," he said.

Harris barrister Sonia Woodley said she would today prepare a report on his medical condition, as she plans to ask for a significant jail sentence reduction on Friday on the grounds of his age and general poor health.

Harris had a mini-stroke some years ago and surgery to put in two stents for artery blockages.

Harris has been granted bail and will be sentenced on Friday.

His family also showed no reaction as the verdict was announced although all sat with heads bowed and held hands.

Harris left the court about an hour and a half after the verdicts, clutching his wife Alwen's hand and that of daughter Bindi as they walked slowly to a waiting car, much in the same way they have done every day during the past eight weeks of his trial.

When asked by News Corp Australia whether he had anything to say, Harris made no comment.

Outside court, emotional jury members hugged each other. Eight weeks ago they were strangers but today they share a bond. Such was the weight of the burden placed upon them to convict the star that the judge said they could be exempt from jury duty, if they chose, for the next 10 years.

Harris' friends and manager Jan Kennedy was also emotional as she hugged supporters outside court.

Harris, charged last year with 12 counts of indecently assaulting four girls from 1968 to 1986, was arrested in 2012 after woman in Australia, England and New Zealand began coming forward with claims in the wake of the high-profile child sex revelations surrounding British entertainer Jimmy Savile and other celebrities in the UK in the 1960s, '70s and '80s.

Jenny Hopkins, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for the CPS in London, said prosecution in such historical cases was always difficult, but she hoped the Harris verdicts would act as a warning to others and provide victims with the courage to come forward no matter when the abuse occurred.

"Rolf Harris used his status and position as a world famous children's entertainer to sexually assault young girls over a period spanning 18 years," Ms Hopkins said.

"The victims in this case have suffered in silence for many years and have only recently found the courage to come forward. I would like to pay tribute to the bravery they displayed in coming to court and giving evidence. That bravery and determination has seen Rolf Harris brought to justice and held to account.

"Each victim, unknown to the others, described a similar pattern of behaviour; that of a man acting without fear of the consequences."

Supported by family ... Rolf Harris, and his daughter Bindi Harris at Southwark Crown Court. Picture: Danny E. Martindale Source: Getty Images

The six male and six female jurors had apparently been struggling with a verdict, judging by the eight questions they put to Judge Sweeney.

On the second day of deliberations, the jury asked what steps needed to be taken toward a majority rule verdict over Judge Sweeney's demand for a unanimous verdict.

He even had to remind them to use their common sense in their approach as they appeared confused with balancing their opinion with the evidence.

The judge suggested they show "courage" in their judgments regardless of the consequences and even felt obliged to remind them that good character of the celebrity was not a defence.

Harris had displayed an almost arrogant jocular approach to proceedings with his singing of Jake the Peg and description of his inventing the wobble board and lengthy regaling in his successes over 50 years of entertainment.

He even laughed at one stage, and had to be reminded it was no laughing matter, when it was put to him he had had oral sex with one victim just metres away from his then teenage sleeping daughter Bindi.

All the women were lying, he said, as he dismissed their evidence as misconstrued his "touchy freely" friendly way.

His mood did change, however, as the trial went on, as did that of his family and supporters who audibly tut-tutted at evidence and even scoffed and murmured "get off" when at least one woman began crying as she recalled her trauma following her alleged indecent assault at the hands of Harris.

There were 38 prosecution witnesses and 15 for the defence. But there were to have been many more for both sides.

During the trial the court heard one victim was 13-years-old when she went on holidays with Harris, his wife Alwen and their daughter and best friend Bindi.

She claimed she was first abused when she stepped out of a shower wearing a towel when in a hotel in Hawaii.

She was shocked to see Harris standing in her room, and he gave her a hug before spitting on his fingers then slipping his hand into her towel and assaulting her.

She had had sex education but could not understand what had happened.

Days later she was on the beach and had walked out of the sea when Harris greeted her with a towel and again hugging her in the towel, slipped his hand into her bikini bottoms.

She was to be assaulted twice more on that trip to Hawaii and Australia.

Harris had complemented her on how she looked lovely in her bikini, an act which Harris himself admitted in his trial was a reference to her body and how he had been sexually attracted to her.

It was a damning admission that the jury was reminded about by Judge Nigel Sweeney in his summing up before they retired to consider their verdict.

None of those assaults, however, formed the basis of the indictments since they happened outside the jurisdiction, but the prosecution maintained they supported the build-up to the at least seven instances of abuse, including some involving the spitting on fingers, that the jury accepted happened in England when the girl was still under 16.

Most of those occurred in Harris' home in Bray west of London as the girl visited his daughter Bindi.

And even after she was over the legal age of consent, there were still more tawdry stories from the same victim that the prosecution said went to the heart of the Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde "dark side" character of Harris, including forcing her to give him oral sex when he pulled over in a breakdown lane on a freeway and on a footpath in the country, an indecent assault in front of a seven year old friend and a masturbating fondle while they sat on the couch with an unknowing Bindi watching television.

Then there was a letter Harris wrote to the victim's father, in which he sought forgiveness; he said it was for having had a relationship with the much younger woman, 35 years his junior, while the prosecution successfully argued it was a confessional letter after grooming the woman for sex since she was 13 years old.

Another victim was eight years old in 1969 when she was allegedly assaulted in a community hall where Harris had been performing Two Little Boys.

She asked for his autograph and when he drew her close he allegedly put his hand around over bottom and forcibly between her legs. He made that motion twice.

A third victim also had her bottom grabbed in the mid-to-late 1970s, when she was about 14 years old and working as a waitress at a TV celebrity sports contest day.

She alleged Harris rubbed her back before squeezing her bottom.

There were six other alleged indecent assaults by Harris including on two Australian make-up artists, a 16-year-old fan and her mother from Newcastle, an 18-year-old traveller in Malta who feared she was about to be raped and a 12-year-old girl from Darwin.

These all occurred outside the jurisdiction of the court but were used by the prosecution to show a "pattern" by the defendant.

Originally published as Rolf Harris found guilty
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Look, mum, no hands: pants man

It's The Final Countdown to getting dressed in trackie-dacks. Source: YouTube

I WATCH a lot of television. And I understand a lot of reality stars are only in it for their 15 minutes of fame. But what do most of them offer us by way of practical tips?

My guess is: not much.

So I was pleasantly surprised when I stumbled upon this video which combines the dynamicism of a Bruce Lee film, the score of a federal election and the kind of demure abashment sadly lacking in today's fashion industry.

Not only does this bloke get his pants on without touching them with his hands, but he does it in well under a minute. It takes me longer than that if I use my hands. And at least one or two attempts as I often end up careening across the room into furniture. He even puts them on the right way round.

This is perhaps the most informative and mesmerising clip you'll see today.

Mysophobia (or verminophobia - the pathological fear of contamination and germs) sufferers rejoice! Watch and learn, folks. Watch and learn.

Originally published as Look, mum, no hands: pants man

23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Can we still be friends with Facebook?

Social network Facebook is under fire after its covert 'emotional contagion' study left some users outraged.

Facebook has come under fire for allowing a social "emotional contagion" study. Source: AFP

THERE'S a sign up behind the counter in a cafe in Adelaide that chirpily suggests "If you see someone without a smile, give them one of yours".

The point of the old adage is that moods can be contagious, and we all have the power to spread a bit of cheer. Or gloom. But no-one likes a party pooper.

Our power to manipulate moods in real life — ours and other people's — is something we've always understood innately.

But now, scientists commissioned by social media behemoth Facebook, in the US, have revealed research they say proves our emotions can be toyed with in the virtual world, on social media, where so many of us spend so much of our time.

And their experiment has caused a hellbroth of trouble.

Over a random week in 2012, without telling them, researchers from Facebook, the University of California, University of San Francisco and Cornell University, manipulated the news feeds of 689,000 users, filtering content to tone down updates containing words considered to be "negative" for some people and words considered "positive" for other users.
The point of the study? To see if the emotions people were exposed to would have an influence over the mood of their own subsequent status updates.

They found that they did. They had proved the possibility of "emotional contagion".

"..for people who had positive content reduced in their News Feed, a larger percentage of words in people's status updates were negative and a smaller percentage were positive. When negativity

was reduced, the opposite pattern occurred," the study's authors wrote.

The findings of the study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences earlier this month, have sent shockwaves around the world — and not just because of the findings of the experiment itself, but because the guinea pigs, real people like you, had no idea they were taking part.

The researchers maintain the experiment was legal, because users must agree to Facebook's Data Use policy, when they sign up for an account.

But legal experts, academics and politicians around the world say that while the study may have been legal, it was unethical, too, because users were not able to give "informed consent".

Internet expert Clay Johnson, who co-founded the firm which managed Barack Obama's online campaign for the 2008 Presidential election called the study "terrifying" and called for someone to launch a class action against Facebook.

"In the wake of both the Snowden stuff and the Cuba Twitter stuff, the Facebook 'transmission of anger' experiment is terrifying", Mr Johnson said in a series of tweets.

"Could the CIA incite revolution in Sudan by pressuring Facebook to promote discontent? Should that be legal?"

Rachel Spencer, from the School of Law at the University of South Australia, said putting the legality of the study aside, the research appeared not to have followed the basic standards for ethical research by a university.

"Normally, when you conduct research into human subjects, you have to get permission from the Ethics Committee of a university and I would be very surprised if an Ethics Committee would approve of such a methodology," Ms Spencer said.

She said forcing people to feel happier or sadder, or withholding potentially important personal information because it was negative, such as the death of a friend or loved one, clearly could have a range of serious and worrying consequences.

"Finding out that you had been manipulated like that could also cause adverse consequences too — people with mental health issues or a fragile state of mind, for whatever reason, could be quite severely affected," she said.

"Just the thought of a company monitoring what I'm being told is a little bit creepy."

Terry O'Gorman, president of the Australian Councils for Civil Liberties agreed, saying Facebook's argument that the study was above board was "legalistic".

"Do you know anyone who's read 2000 words of Facebook's privacy policy?" Mr O'Gorman said.

"People genuinely feel they've been used by Facebook.

"If you're one of the users, and you find that your Facebook usage has been subject to some kind of emotional analysis, I think you're entitled to say that's a breach of privacy."

He said the fact tens of thousands of people still might not be aware their News Feed had been manipulated was irrelevant.

"Because people do not realise that in using Facebook, they're handing over data to be analysed by anonymous people who will never tell you what they're using it for and you'll never know the end result."

But if the whole thing feels creepy and Orwellian, what's in it for Facebook? Merely to add to the canon of psychology research?
Hardly, says Dr Karen Nelson-Field, Senior Research in the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute at UniSA.

It's all about marketing, she says, adding that she personally thinks the study adds to our understanding of the kinds of stimuli people respond to emotionally and that they share socially.

"What they've done is amazing, because it adds to the psychology literature on such a large scale," Dr Nelson-Field said.

"It would have been largely to see what content gets talked about, it would have been related around emotions.

"They've done it to understand a benchmark reaction (from users) to brands and reaction to sentiment to work out, in the future, where advertisers are best placed in terms of sending out positive and negative messages.

"It's not rocket science. If you watch a scary movie, you feel scared."

Dr Nelson-Field said people who argued the study was deceptive and unethical were "overreacting".

"If you sign up for a platform, you sign up to their privacy statements.
"You're exposing yourself to third party (agreements) constantly, so unless you turn your cookies off, you give Facebook 100 per cent rights to serve everything you do — when I say serve, I mean they can on-sell their data to a third party of their can use it themselves."

She said she accepted there may be more ethical ways to conduct the same kinds of research, particularly to filter out people who identified as having mental health issues or who were on medication for a mental illness.
But ultimately, people should know what they're getting into from the outset.

"Take some responsibility," she said.

"Sure, there's always going to be those that are less tech-savvy than others, but at the end of the day, what do you expect? And it hasn't done any harm."

Originally published as Can we still be friends with Facebook?
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Art, or pathetic grab for publicity?

Artwork depicting Charles Saatchi throttling his ex-wife Nigella Lawson being offered for sale on his website. Artist is D Udaiyan. Source: Supplied

LONG after the one — time ad man, renowned art collector and confirmed throttler Charles Saatchi gave his then-wife Nigella Lawson one his most memorable public performances, the simply horrendous incident is still making news.

'Artworks' — and that word is even demeaned in this context — have made their way onto, surprise, surprise, the Saatchi Art website — an American website with ties to the London gallery — 12 months after the London restaurant incident where Saatchi was photographed 'throttling' his globally renowned wife.

Of course, I'd personally love an arty piece of domestic violence/physical abuse/wedded bullying — priced from AU$266 to AU$32,000 — hanging in my little inner-city dwelling.

What a talking point! Just imagine the hours of viewing pleasure.

What a complete toss the whole notion is.

Art, or just poor taste? Source: Supplied

Saatchi was cautioned for assault last June after the appalling restaurant display. The pair went on to divorce seven weeks later.

Later that year, of course, the once-wedded pair were back in the news over a fraud case 'starring' former personal assistants. That time around, there were allegations of Lawson's drug use and Saatchi's controlling behaviour.

But back to these heartfelt and simply sensational artworks.

Wouldn't you want them to remember the good times? The great times? The very happy times of a marriage that came to an end when pictures of the couple were printed came to light after a mega physical dispute in the smart and celebrity-frequented London restaurant, Scotts?

Sure, sure, some members of the art-eratti will be claiming that pulling them down would be censorship.

They'll say that they are an exquisite symbol of free artistic speech; of 'real' life; that they are not inciting hatred but are representing love having gone seriously wrong. But to me, they are none of the above. These are two people who are still alive and both are being represented in a revolting light. Again.

Nigella Lawson's domestic goddess image has had to weather a lot of controversy. Picture: Justin Lloyd Source: Supplied

To actually see these drawings and paintings re-enacting the Saatchi-Lawson restaurant calamity is pure tastelessness.

Would anyone — including the subjects involved — really shell out $10000 for a work of a smug-looking Saatchi with a blatantly frightened Nigella, set against a jaunty, multi-hued, van Gogh-inspired background?

The photographs in the London restaurant were obviously the straw that broke the camel's back _ and the pair's marriage. And these artworks, which were painted and drawn not long after the event, shouldn't be glorified. They should be garbaged.

A report in the UK's Independent singles out certain pieces — 'Art Collector Throttling Cook' and 'Last Course', and one of the artists, Darren Udaiyan (who concocted the van Gogh inspired piece) draws an analogy that Saatchi 'throttling his wife' is akin to him 'squeezing the art market'.

Good grief. The whole thing is just tasteless.

Originally published as Art, or pathetic grab for publicity?
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Rolf Harris found guilty

Under scrutiny ... Rolf Harris with his daughter Bindi after attending Southwark Crown Court in central London. Picture: Niklas Halle'n Source: AFP

ROLF Harris has been found guilty of sexually assaulting four teenage school girls over an almost 20-year period with a jury unanimously declaring him guilty on all charges in a sensational conclusion to his long running trial.

After eight days of deliberations as the trial entered its eighth week, the six man and six woman jury returned to court 2 of Southwark Crown Court in central London shortly after lunch (local time) to unanimously declare his guilt.

Verdict decided ... Rolf Harris arrives at Southwark Crown Court today in London, England. Picture: Danny E. Martindale Source: Getty Images

The 84-year-old Harris — a household name with more than 50 years in the music, art and TV entertainment industries — was expressionless as Judge Nigel Sweeney asked the jury forewoman for their verdict.

The legendary Australian entertainer showed no emotion as the jury forewoman said "guilty" on each count.

As he left the defendant's dock, Harris managed a reassuring nod and grimace for his family who held hands and comforted each other.

For seven weeks they had heard claims by the prosecution their loved one was a sinister pervert who groomed girls for abuse, and despite making audible remarks and head shakes while victims testified, yesterday they said nothing in the face of the verdict.

Guilty ... Harris arrives with his wife Alwen Hughes (2nd R) and daughter Bindi (L) at Southwark Crown Court in London before hearing the verdict. Picture: AFP Source: AFP

The family's spokesman Abel Hadden asked they be respected and not asked for comment.

"Following today's verdicts, we have been asked to make it clear that neither the Harris family, their lawyers, agents or friends will be making any public comments or being available for interview either here or in Australia," he said.

Harris barrister Sonia Woodley said she would today prepare a report on his medical condition, as she plans to ask for a significant jail sentence reduction on Friday on the grounds of his age and general poor health.

Harris had a mini-stroke some years ago and surgery to put in two stents for artery blockages.

Harris has been granted bail and will be sentenced on Friday.

His family also showed no reaction as the verdict was announced although all sat with heads bowed and held hands.

Harris left the court about an hour and a half after the verdicts, clutching his wife Alwen's hand and that of daughter Bindi as they walked slowly to a waiting car, much in the same way they have done every day during the past eight weeks of his trial.

When asked by News Corp Australia whether he had anything to say, Harris made no comment.

Outside court, emotional jury members hugged each other. Eight weeks ago they were strangers but today they share a bond. Such was the weight of the burden placed upon them to convict the star that the judge said they could be exempt from jury duty, if they chose, for the next 10 years.

Harris' friends and manager Jan Kennedy was also emotional as she hugged supporters outside court.

Harris, charged last year with 12 counts of indecently assaulting four girls from 1968 to 1986, was arrested in 2012 after woman in Australia, England and New Zealand began coming forward with claims in the wake of the high-profile child sex revelations surrounding British entertainer Jimmy Savile and other celebrities in the UK in the 1960s, '70s and '80s.

Jenny Hopkins, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for the CPS in London, said prosecution in such historical cases was always difficult, but she hoped the Harris verdicts would act as a warning to others and provide victims with the courage to come forward no matter when the abuse occurred.

"Rolf Harris used his status and position as a world famous children's entertainer to sexually assault young girls over a period spanning 18 years," Ms Hopkins said.

"The victims in this case have suffered in silence for many years and have only recently found the courage to come forward. I would like to pay tribute to the bravery they displayed in coming to court and giving evidence. That bravery and determination has seen Rolf Harris brought to justice and held to account.

"Each victim, unknown to the others, described a similar pattern of behaviour; that of a man acting without fear of the consequences."

Supported by family ... Rolf Harris, and his daughter Bindi Harris at Southwark Crown Court. Picture: Danny E. Martindale Source: Getty Images

The six male and six female jurors had apparently been struggling with a verdict, judging by the eight questions they put to Judge Sweeney.

On the second day of deliberations, the jury asked what steps needed to be taken toward a majority rule verdict over Judge Sweeney's demand for a unanimous verdict.

He even had to remind them to use their common sense in their approach as they appeared confused with balancing their opinion with the evidence.

The judge suggested they show "courage" in their judgments regardless of the consequences and even felt obliged to remind them that good character of the celebrity was not a defence.

Harris had displayed an almost arrogant jocular approach to proceedings with his singing of Jake the Peg and description of his inventing the wobble board and lengthy regaling in his successes over 50 years of entertainment.

He even laughed at one stage, and had to be reminded it was no laughing matter, when it was put to him he had had oral sex with one victim just metres away from his then teenage sleeping daughter Bindi.

All the women were lying, he said, as he dismissed their evidence as misconstrued his "touchy freely" friendly way.

His mood did change, however, as the trial went on, as did that of his family and supporters who audibly tut-tutted at evidence and even scoffed and murmured "get off" when at least one woman began crying as she recalled her trauma following her alleged indecent assault at the hands of Harris.

There were 38 prosecution witnesses and 15 for the defence. But there were to have been many more for both sides.

During the trial the court heard one victim was 13-years-old when she went on holidays with Harris, his wife Alwen and their daughter and best friend Bindi.

She claimed she was first abused when she stepped out of a shower wearing a towel when in a hotel in Hawaii.

She was shocked to see Harris standing in her room, and he gave her a hug before spitting on his fingers then slipping his hand into her towel and assaulting her.

She had had sex education but could not understand what had happened.

Days later she was on the beach and had walked out of the sea when Harris greeted her with a towel and again hugging her in the towel, slipped his hand into her bikini bottoms.

She was to be assaulted twice more on that trip to Hawaii and Australia.

Harris had complemented her on how she looked lovely in her bikini, an act which Harris himself admitted in his trial was a reference to her body and how he had been sexually attracted to her.

It was a damning admission that the jury was reminded about by Judge Nigel Sweeney in his summing up before they retired to consider their verdict.

None of those assaults, however, formed the basis of the indictments since they happened outside the jurisdiction, but the prosecution maintained they supported the build-up to the at least seven instances of abuse, including some involving the spitting on fingers, that the jury accepted happened in England when the girl was still under 16.

Most of those occurred in Harris' home in Bray west of London as the girl visited his daughter Bindi.

And even after she was over the legal age of consent, there were still more tawdry stories from the same victim that the prosecution said went to the heart of the Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde "dark side" character of Harris, including forcing her to give him oral sex when he pulled over in a breakdown lane on a freeway and on a footpath in the country, an indecent assault in front of a seven year old friend and a masturbating fondle while they sat on the couch with an unknowing Bindi watching television.

Then there was a letter Harris wrote to the victim's father, in which he sought forgiveness; he said it was for having had a relationship with the much younger woman, 35 years his junior, while the prosecution successfully argued it was a confessional letter after grooming the woman for sex since she was 13 years old.

Another victim was eight years old in 1969 when she was allegedly assaulted in a community hall where Harris had been performing Two Little Boys.

She asked for his autograph and when he drew her close he allegedly put his hand around over bottom and forcibly between her legs. He made that motion twice.

A third victim also had her bottom grabbed in the mid-to-late 1970s, when she was about 14 years old and working as a waitress at a TV celebrity sports contest day.

She alleged Harris rubbed her back before squeezing her bottom.

There were six other alleged indecent assaults by Harris including on two Australian make-up artists, a 16-year-old fan and her mother from Newcastle, an 18-year-old traveller in Malta who feared she was about to be raped and a 12-year-old girl from Darwin.

These all occurred outside the jurisdiction of the court but were used by the prosecution to show a "pattern" by the defendant.

Originally published as Rolf Harris found guilty
23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Ricky’s ‘killer sauce’ turns up heat

Written By Unknown on Senin, 23 Juni 2014 | 23.18

Singing 'This is what it feels like', Victoria's Jackson Thomas powers through his performance. Courtesy: The Voice

TEAM Ricky stormed into favouritism in the first of The Voice's live finals, with his "killer sauce" singers turning up the heat on the competition.

In the surprise package of the evening, Jackson Thomas won his coach Ricky Martin's fast pass to the next round — saved from the public vote, which opened for the first time this season.

Thomas turned summer's pop rock anthem This Is What It Feels Like into an achingly emotional ballad which tamed rival coach on The Voice Kylie Minogue and wowed Joel Madden and will.i.am.

JOEL MADDEN: Opens up on life and 'that joint'

VOICE KIDS: Plea to internet trolls

Rocking out ... Jackson Thomas on The Voice with Team Ricky. Source: Channel 9

The quiet achiever overcame the power and passion of C Major, Sabrina Batshon and Elly Oh who all delivered stand-out performances in a somewhat patchy episode.

Coldplay, especially the smiling dial of front man Chris Martin, set an electric tone opening the show.

It's clear the contestants were also star struck when they met him backstage.

Musical genius ... Chris Martin on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

A real show ... Chris Martin and the band Coldplay on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

Martin's opening was followed by performances from Team Will's Anja Nissen, Mat Verevis, ZK and Gabriel and Cecelia.

Their Black Eyed Peas coach responded with mixed feelings, praising their collective efforts but admitting they were "rocky" and "tense" in parts.

Singing 'Walking on a Dream', duo Gabriel and Cecilia get fast tracked into the next round of The Voice. Courtesy: The Voice

His decision to save sibling duo Gabriel and Cecelia divided social media, but won support from Madden and Minogue.

Getting another chance ... Gabriel and Cecelia saved on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

The pop princess, who hosted her team over dinner at Mr Chow's, her favourite restaurant in London, also drew solid performances from her foursome: with charismatic drummer Johnny Rollins rewarded with her save.

Performing to the beat of his drum ... Johnny Rollins on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

Singing 'Happy', Victorian Johnny Rollins goes from back of the band to front man with ease. Courtesy: The Voice

Others watching the show also backed Rollins and his talent.

Team Joel's resident rocker Frank Lakoudis was back at his ball-tearing best, raising the roof with the Kiss classic, I Was Made For Lovin' You and winning his way to the next live final.

Singing the Kiss classic, 'I was made for lovin' you', Frank Lakoudis sings loud and proud. Courtesy: The Voice

On fire ... Frank Lakoudis dons a cape on stage for The Voice. Source: Channel 9

Captivating ... Frank performs on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

There was also a lot of love in the Twittersphere for Lakoudis, but some questioned his choice to wear a cape as part of his wardrobe choice.

Amping up the vamp action, a black lace and thigh-high boot-wearing Holly Tapp showed little of the hippie cowgirl who charmed in the blind auditions, singing Bang Bang.

Hippie cowgirl ... singer Holly Tapp on The Voice. Source: Channel 9

Isaac McGovern and Taila Gouge both showed more of their potential, with 17-year-old Gouge fierce and feminine with her take on Pink's Who Knew.

Giving his best shot ... Isaac McGovern sang Best Day Of My Life. Source: Channel 9

Hoping for a place ... Taila Gouge performed Pink's song Who Knew. Source: Channel 9

At the marathon episode's end, iTunes voting showed who the viewer favourites are, with Team Will's ZK leading the early chart race (climbing to no. 38); followed by Team Kylie's Kat Jade (no. 44); and Robbie Balmer (no. 48).

A new look ... for Kat Jade on The Voice. Source: Channel 9


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

How to turn your cooking fails into works of art

The Struggle Plate is an online safe haven for average cooks. Source: Instagram

IT'S the ultimate 21st century dilemma: you cook a meal, it tastes delicious, but it looks bloody awful.

There's no way you can post a photo of your creation on Instagram. Everyone on the #foodporn hashtag would make a mockery of you.

Enter The Struggle Plate — an awesome Instagram account and online safe haven for average cooks everywhere.

Users submit photos of their gross-looking meals using the #struggleplate hashtag and the worst offenders are posted on the Instagram account. Its mantra? "Bad food + confidence = the struggle plate".

Here's how Urban Dictionary defines this hilarious food trend:

"A dish of food that either looks like nasty, unappetising slop or is simply ugly in presentation, even if it might actually taste good," it reads.

"Term even applies to when one posts a picture that exposes his or her lack of culinary savvy.

"Person who prepared said food is usually quite delusional, really believing they just threw down like a gourmet chef."

Here are some shining examples of the ultimate #struggleplate. A warning: These might gross you out.

Do you have a Struggle Plate photo you'd like to share? Tag news.com.au on Twitter or Instagram using the hashtag #struggleplate.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Live: Socceroos v Spain

LIVE coverage of the FIFA World Cup 2014 in Brazil. Every day we follow the Socceroos on their World Cup journey. Plus all the highlights from Brazil, the latest breaking World Cup news, the best goals, the results and the real stories behind the scenes of the World Cup.

IT'S the last hurrah for Ange Postecoglou and the Socceroos as they take on deposed world champion Spain in both sides' final appearance at the 2014 World Cup.

Follow the blow-by-blow coverage below.


23.18 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger